Hello,
Prior to the invention of metal detectors, our primitive ancestors walked about the desert picking up nuggets on the surface using their primitive stone tools.
Then along came VLF detectors, and the scavengers ravaged the lands and collected most of the small nuggets near the surface.
Then the high tech modern monkeys went out with their gpx5000s and found the leftovers that were missed by the early tech humans.
I would like to design a metal detector that uses a higher current and much larger coil that detects monster nuggets deeper than the gpx5000 but ignores all the smaller candy that the gpx5000 would find.
My question is, how rare are these monster nuggets? Its like finding a needle in a haystack. Is it feasible that there are big golden eggs 1 and half to 2m down that minelab cant detect?
Or is this just a waste of time?
I realize that this is more of a geology type question than an electronic question but would appreciate your views on the issue.
Prior to the invention of metal detectors, our primitive ancestors walked about the desert picking up nuggets on the surface using their primitive stone tools.
Then along came VLF detectors, and the scavengers ravaged the lands and collected most of the small nuggets near the surface.
Then the high tech modern monkeys went out with their gpx5000s and found the leftovers that were missed by the early tech humans.
I would like to design a metal detector that uses a higher current and much larger coil that detects monster nuggets deeper than the gpx5000 but ignores all the smaller candy that the gpx5000 would find.
My question is, how rare are these monster nuggets? Its like finding a needle in a haystack. Is it feasible that there are big golden eggs 1 and half to 2m down that minelab cant detect?
Or is this just a waste of time?
I realize that this is more of a geology type question than an electronic question but would appreciate your views on the issue.
Comment