Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PICKINI - an easy to build PI detector

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • i just hear the startup tone and no ticking sound
    get 8v on the pin3 lm318

    were should i start to search the failure?

    Comment


    • When You look here:
      http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...detector/page3 -- post #60
      All DC voltages are mentioned.
      It looks like there is something wrong with the input -- the microcontroller does not get a flyback pulse after sending the first switch-on pulse.
      The coil - input opamp - clamping diodes --- check the polarity of C9 = coupling capacitor to opamp input.
      Hope this helps,
      - Bernard

      Comment


      • hello
        i have used hispalbas layout - that was not good
        missing connection
        from coil (upper coil marking) to +rail from cap C6
        not funny

        and i still have two 1k resitors parallel to coil
        because i had jumped the post where it was written to replace them bei 470r (i think a least 1W) dampening resitor
        typical file salad
        and i lost the overview
        will start it with a new board i think

        and after finishing i will write an how to send the hexcode to the pic manual (had waste some yours with experimenting and it was so easy when you would know where to set the marking in the new mplab 1.9)



        thanks bernard for fast reply and help

        Comment


        • This is my original layout that works:

          Click image for larger version

Name:	PICKINI_board.png
Views:	2
Size:	8.1 KB
ID:	337964

          On Your layout, there is no connection between the +12V rail and the coil.
          You can add a simple wire bridge to solve this.

          You can use 2x1K in parallel ( normal resistors) as dampening resistor - instead of the single 470 ohms resistor.

          Best regards,
          - Bernard

          Comment


          • some pictures of my crap board
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DVCI0122.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	349.6 KB
ID:	337965Click image for larger version

Name:	DVCI0123.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	254.8 KB
ID:	337966

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Brian Deese View Post
              How do we determine the time constant of our target in question? I try to read everything you and Eric write. In those post's I see TC alot,but I dont completely understand the principle.
              If you have not already done so you should read the Target Time Constants thread in this Tech Forum. It addresses some typical T/Cs and also gives some info on repeatable Time Constant Standards made from aluminum can and heavy duty aluminum foil. These standards are valuable in testing the capabilities of a detector especially if you are trying to detect small gold targets.

              Good Luck

              Dan

              Comment


              • Bernard
                in post #199 your pcb has large earth planes on it, but when I view the pcb from your site they are missing, did you remove them ?
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • When You open the PCB file in Eagle and You right click on the ground trace and select "ratsnets", the ground plane [ the dotted outline filled ] should appear.
                  I never succeeded in saving the layout in Eagle with the plane visible

                  - Bernard

                  Comment


                  • Bernard
                    Thanks that information works.
                    Now with grid off, rats nest on, layers 16,17,18,19,20 all on
                    I now get this
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • hello
                      can i replace the pic 16f1824 with the 16f1825 ?
                      easier and cheaper to find

                      regards

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bernte_one View Post
                        hello
                        can i replace the pic 16f1824 with the 16f1825 ?
                        easier and cheaper to find

                        regards
                        I received 2 samples from microchip...free
                        regards
                        john

                        Comment


                        • can i replace the pic 16f1824 with the 16f1825 ?
                          easier and cheaper to find
                          Not sure why you would want to do this:

                          With Farnell (Germany): 16F1824 = 1.44€
                          http://de.farnell.com/microchip/pic1...dip/dp/1814944

                          16F1825 = 2.08 €
                          http://de.farnell.com/microchip/pic1...dip/dp/2045294

                          [surprised] ??? [/surprised]

                          Regards,
                          - Bernard

                          Comment


                          • 16f630

                            hi all
                            F117 i think i could replace your 16f616 by 16f630 because when reading their datasheet they are very cross (same pinout),so have you got an idea of what i have to change in your hex (16f616) to burn in my pic (16f630) ?
                            thanks

                            Comment


                            • Nick,
                              I don't think you can change the hex file like this.
                              Starting from the sources you could recompile for another controller.
                              But again, the 16F616 is commonly available.
                              here eg:
                              http://fr.farnell.com/microchip/pic1...?ref=lookahead

                              Comment


                              • I know this only from the AVRs. For example, you can get a ATmega88 instead of inserting an Atmega8. But then you have to change something in the software. For example, hardware and software stack. You also have to tell the program the other chip. This changes also (though only slightly) the HEX.ffile after the compile.
                                In PICs it will be safe like that ...
                                Dixix

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X