Betonköpfe!!! 


(*LOL*)
TD is simple and cheap to implement. But not elegant.
Below is a FD response of a piece of ferrite (soft ferrite I think). It's a typical low frequency response, whereas the resistive targets cause higher high frequency component responses. The graph is made of real measurement data (nothing theoretical) and is a normalized response.

The FD method gives you much more benefits, which you can't do it in the time-domain:
- Noise reduction (low frequency -> high frequency harmonics)
- Induction balance mismatch detection and correction
- Much much better GB
- Less resistive response loss (GB is lossy)
Still want to ride the dead horse?

Aziz



(*LOL*)
TD is simple and cheap to implement. But not elegant.
Below is a FD response of a piece of ferrite (soft ferrite I think). It's a typical low frequency response, whereas the resistive targets cause higher high frequency component responses. The graph is made of real measurement data (nothing theoretical) and is a normalized response.
The FD method gives you much more benefits, which you can't do it in the time-domain:
- Noise reduction (low frequency -> high frequency harmonics)
- Induction balance mismatch detection and correction
- Much much better GB
- Less resistive response loss (GB is lossy)
Still want to ride the dead horse?

Aziz
Comment