Ground Balance Theory

[dougAEGPF]

Doug you are the one that is speculating,and jumping to conclusions as usual.
The tests were done or I wouldn't have brought the subject up. Unlike you I
don't rely on google for everything I know.

Allan your multimeter thing only shows your arrogance ,as does your comment
that non ferrous metals were not the problem with that ground.

What tests did you do and what did they show? Have you done any resistivity studies? Resistivity studies would give you a lot of info. As AZ has many sulphide deposits (conductive) then its quite possible that your problems are due to them! They do not appear to be due to SPM magnetite or maghaemite ie magnetic viscosity effects, so disseminated sulphides particularly those hosted in carbonate terrains would be possible candidates. Other than that you are looking at earth current effects eg telluric currents.
dougAEGPF

[Prospector_Al]

Doug you are the one that is speculating,and jumping to conclusions as usual.
The tests were done or I wouldn't have brought the subject up. Unlike you I
don't rely on google for everything I know.

Allan your multimeter thing only shows your arrogance ,as does your comment
that non ferrous metals were not the problem with that ground.

Hi Sawmill,

My alleged personality defects are not an appropriate subject for this thread--If you have any technical data on the tests you performed on your claim I would be interested to hear about them.

Allan

P.S. Arrogance is of great help to an inventor. It takes a great deal of arrogance to ignore the opinions of those who believe they are experts. Were it not for a certain degree of arrogance of some innovators, status quo would be maintained forever.

[dougAEGPF]

Hi Sawmill,

If you have any technical data on the tests you performed on your claim I would be interested to hear about them.

Allan
.

So would I and many others! I wonder if sawmill has a copy of ELECTRIC ACTIVITY IN ORE DEPOSITS.
BY ROGER C. WELLS
dougAEGPF

[Aziz]

Hi all,

I will implement more features, which will make the evidence more clearer. You must see the power of the difference between an exponential decay (e^(-t/TC)) and the magnetic relaxation induction decay (1/t^a).

The magnetic relaxation induction decay is a natural law! Can't be patented.
Exploiting the natural behaviour of the two functions is a math law and can't be patented too.

DO YOU WANT THIS THREAD BECOMING THE ULTIMATE GB THREAD?
Yes or No?

Aziz

[Aziz]

..
P.S. Arrogance is of great help to an inventor. It takes a great deal of arrogance to ignore the opinions of those who believe they are experts. Were it not for a certain degree of arrogance of some innovators, status quo would be maintained forever.

Hi Allan,

if you have something, which goes deeper on large gold, bring it on!!!
This is, what the gold prospectors are asking for as the shallow flysh1te nuggets being already unearthed.

Cheers,
Aziz

[Prospector_Al]

Hi Allan,

if you have something, which goes deeper on large gold, bring it on!!!
This is, what the gold prospectors are asking for as the shallow flysh1te nuggets being already unearthed.

Cheers,
Aziz

Hi Aziz,

Last Saturday I compared the S.A.D. (Süper Altin Dedektör) with the best available detectors in a field test.
The S.A.D. has a 97% advantage in mineralised soil for large nuggets. The Australian Aluminium Block was one of the test targets.

Owing to the turmoil that the release of this detector is going to cause in the metal detector market, I'm seeking legal advice to make sure that any attempt to stop the marketing of this detector will have severe adverse consequences for anyone who tries to protect their market share from legitimate competition by legal means.

I'm not authorized to reveal any technical details other than to say that the technology is novel and does not infringe on any patents.

The timing of the release has not been fixed. Another model of the same detector family will be released first. It will have a more modest depth advantage for large nuggets, but it will be more sensitive to medium size nuggets.

T.T Rocks,

Allan

[Aziz]

Hi Aziz,

Last Saturday I compared the S.A.D. (Süper Altin Dedektör) with the best available detectors in a field test.
The S.A.D. has a 97% advantage in mineralised soil for large nuggets. The Australian Aluminium Block was one of the test targets.

Owing to the turmoil that the release of this detector is going to cause in the metal detector market, I'm seeking legal advice to make sure that any attempt to stop the marketing of this detector will have severe adverse consequences for anyone who tries to protect their market share from legitimate competition by legal means.

I'm not authorized to reveal any technical details other than to say that the technology is novel and does not infringe on any patents.

The timing of the release has not been fixed. Another model of the same detector family will be released first. It will have a more modest depth advantage for large nuggets, but it will be more sensitive to medium size nuggets.

T.T Rocks,

Allan

Hi Allan,

that's great!, I'm looking forward to your efforts and progresses.
SAD(tm) news to the competitors however. Anyway.

Cheers,
Aziz

PS: Yep, T.T Rocks.

[techo_bob]

Hi Allan

Any ideas how this S.A.D Detecctor will perform on Australian ground

can't wait for its release.


Techo Bob.

[Prospector_Al]

Hi Bob,

The detector will lose some depth. How much can only be determined empirically. But there will be no "electronic holes".

Regards,

Allan

[techo_bob]

Thank's Allan

Will wait for the outcome.

Bob..

[mikebg]

So would I and many others! I wonder if sawmill has a copy of ELECTRIC ACTIVITY IN ORE DEPOSITS.
BY ROGER C. WELLS
dougAEGPF

Doug is right.
Measurements in Frequency domain showed that the Australian soil has also significant conductivity.
Here are the copies:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/0548/report.pdf

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=...page&q&f=false

[dougAEGPF]

Doug is right.
Measurements in Frequency domain showed that the Australian soil has also significant conductivity.
Here are the copies:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/0548/report.pdf

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=...page&q&f=false

Thanks its good to know I am right sometimes! I wonder if this post will survive the current brutal censorship regime on this forum!Talk about being under the thumb of ML!!
dougAEGPF

[UrbanFox]

Doug is right.
Measurements in Frequency domain showed that the Australian soil has also significant conductivity.
Here are the copies:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/0548/report.pdf

Mike, there is no reference to Oz soils in your first link that I can see.

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=...page&q&f=false

Also, there is no reference to Oz soils in your second link that I can see.

Am I missing something??

Thanks its good to know I am right sometimes!

Maybe every once in a while, but not very often!!

[dougAEGPF]

There are many papers from for example from the CSIRO showing that significant portions of Australian ancient soils have moderate to high conductivity!!!!!!
dougAEGPF

[mikebg]

Mike, there is no reference to Oz soils in your first link that I can see.
Also, there is no reference to Oz soils in your second link that I can see.
Am I missing something??

UrbanFox, you are missing this link
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...759#post131759

The post relates to block diagram in this post
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...099#post131099

Theory shows that phase angle of pure permeability is independent on diameter of TX loop.
The theoretical spectral characteristic of soil without conductivity is shown in this post
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...214#post130214

Below is attached the measured spectral characteristic. It shows that soil has combinarion of permeability and conductivity because the response contains timeconstants. The position of frequencies A, C, D and Q depend on diameter of excitating loop:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...462#post104462

Here is visual illustration:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...752#post163752