hi landman,
yesterday I was treasure-hunting - it was really cool.
1.)
Clearing the area is relative, it just makes things a bit easier.
The good thing with a nonmotion detector like the DeepHunter or Goldengate is:
The signal is as big as the target is.
This means you can hunt even right away inclusive ignoring all the smaller "short beeping" stuff.
I did this to find all the cannon-balls first. This method is better for your own motivation because
clearing the area first is like clearing a garden first from the unwanted plants.
But it also depends how much infested with junk is the area - if the junk is too big like larger
alu-foils, wire, drink-cans or empty gun-rounds this stuff really can mask whats directly below.
The Ace 250 will do well enough if there is no e-smog and if the soil isn't high mineralized - you can use the medium or larger coil.
With allmetal you will find both, iron and noble metal, but I would ignore all the small iron stuff and even the clearing
would be just some sort of removing the most interesting stuff first.
See treasure-hunting as "eat away first the yummy cream of the cherry-pie" - even if you have to remove junk from an area first.
If you start to remove meter by meter completly every little crap others will grab the real stuff.
btw. first you have to be shure that clearing of an area full of junk really pays off otherwise its just wasted time and energy.
Either you have 1st hand reliable info or you better clear first only smaller parts and check out if there is really deep stuff, too.
Usually there is not every 20cm junk so you just might be lucky and find a spot without clearing at all where the
detector shows you directly a long, soft and weak but very deep objects oscillator-curve or other signals for real deep stuff.
2.)
About the Andes mountains - you're lucky because I really have experience with mountain treasure hunting - the highest
place meanwhile where I've been with a detector was 2400m (around 7000 ft.) above sea. With the Garrett Euro Ace
because its very lightweight and a backup of 4x alkaline batteries, too.
It really depends how your treasure-hunt in the mountain works - I was already with the Jeohunter at very steep hills
an found cannon-balls there but this is pretty hard work and with the risk of geting hurt. Using the Blisstool at that
same region was much more easy, even when the depth was a little bit less.
For mountains the best compromise is a very lightweight 30cm coil and a very lightweight detector.
But if I would hunt at antique castle-ruins up on mountains I would use the DeepHunter with non-motion 45cm coil
because every inch of depth and every plus of mineralization-depth power counts at such locations.
The main important thing: you should have always one hand empty if the climbing area is not too dangerous.
If you fall you can hold on to something very fast and you don't have to throw away your detector or other stuff first.
And while it can be very exhausting hiking and sweeping alltogether its important being able using both arms
once in a while so the other one always can regenerate.
And you absolutly should look for some coil-protection covers. One sharp stone near your way and the coil could became
more than just a few scratches.
> explore each area to see the potential of several sites and then to bring bigger heavier deeper equipment in at a later date.
Yeah, this ist the perfect method - I would do it the same. First you really have to find some clues at all.
I'm talking about exploring total "terra incognita" or regions from which so far no reliable information exists.
Of course if you wanna go to some ruins and you know that at similar places have been found rare metal artefacts
and the stones are high mineralic there, you better bring the pro-equipment directly with you - this saves some
precious days and the weight difference of a few kg is not that extreme.
> What do you think about this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-cyuaniLBg#t=484
For steep and high mineralized mountains and if you wanna have good discrimination its not the best choice.
And it can causes too much inconvinience if theres a larger backpack on the shoulders plus the P.I. box at the chest.
yesterday I was treasure-hunting - it was really cool.

1.)
Clearing the area is relative, it just makes things a bit easier.
The good thing with a nonmotion detector like the DeepHunter or Goldengate is:
The signal is as big as the target is.
This means you can hunt even right away inclusive ignoring all the smaller "short beeping" stuff.
I did this to find all the cannon-balls first. This method is better for your own motivation because
clearing the area first is like clearing a garden first from the unwanted plants.
But it also depends how much infested with junk is the area - if the junk is too big like larger
alu-foils, wire, drink-cans or empty gun-rounds this stuff really can mask whats directly below.
The Ace 250 will do well enough if there is no e-smog and if the soil isn't high mineralized - you can use the medium or larger coil.
With allmetal you will find both, iron and noble metal, but I would ignore all the small iron stuff and even the clearing
would be just some sort of removing the most interesting stuff first.
See treasure-hunting as "eat away first the yummy cream of the cherry-pie" - even if you have to remove junk from an area first.
If you start to remove meter by meter completly every little crap others will grab the real stuff.
btw. first you have to be shure that clearing of an area full of junk really pays off otherwise its just wasted time and energy.
Either you have 1st hand reliable info or you better clear first only smaller parts and check out if there is really deep stuff, too.
Usually there is not every 20cm junk so you just might be lucky and find a spot without clearing at all where the
detector shows you directly a long, soft and weak but very deep objects oscillator-curve or other signals for real deep stuff.
2.)
About the Andes mountains - you're lucky because I really have experience with mountain treasure hunting - the highest
place meanwhile where I've been with a detector was 2400m (around 7000 ft.) above sea. With the Garrett Euro Ace
because its very lightweight and a backup of 4x alkaline batteries, too.
It really depends how your treasure-hunt in the mountain works - I was already with the Jeohunter at very steep hills
an found cannon-balls there but this is pretty hard work and with the risk of geting hurt. Using the Blisstool at that
same region was much more easy, even when the depth was a little bit less.
For mountains the best compromise is a very lightweight 30cm coil and a very lightweight detector.
But if I would hunt at antique castle-ruins up on mountains I would use the DeepHunter with non-motion 45cm coil
because every inch of depth and every plus of mineralization-depth power counts at such locations.
The main important thing: you should have always one hand empty if the climbing area is not too dangerous.
If you fall you can hold on to something very fast and you don't have to throw away your detector or other stuff first.
And while it can be very exhausting hiking and sweeping alltogether its important being able using both arms
once in a while so the other one always can regenerate.
And you absolutly should look for some coil-protection covers. One sharp stone near your way and the coil could became
more than just a few scratches.
> explore each area to see the potential of several sites and then to bring bigger heavier deeper equipment in at a later date.
Yeah, this ist the perfect method - I would do it the same. First you really have to find some clues at all.
I'm talking about exploring total "terra incognita" or regions from which so far no reliable information exists.
Of course if you wanna go to some ruins and you know that at similar places have been found rare metal artefacts
and the stones are high mineralic there, you better bring the pro-equipment directly with you - this saves some
precious days and the weight difference of a few kg is not that extreme.
> What do you think about this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-cyuaniLBg#t=484
For steep and high mineralized mountains and if you wanna have good discrimination its not the best choice.
And it can causes too much inconvinience if theres a larger backpack on the shoulders plus the P.I. box at the chest.
Comment