Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New PI machine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Pictures first

    This is it.

    The induction balanced coil configuration. Note, that the inner mean diameter is 102.3 mm whereas the outer mean diameter is 10 inch (inch != mm).

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CoilComp2-ATX-Davor-DD-IB-Coil-01.gif
Views:	1
Size:	17.0 KB
ID:	337561

    The distance gap due to coil bundle thickness (6 mm in this case).
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CoilComp2-ATX-Davor-DD-IB-Coil-02.gif
Views:	1
Size:	9.4 KB
ID:	337562

    The relation to the 10 inch round mono loop coil (=reference coil). Note, that the other coils are normalized to have same amount of EMI noise induction. So N*A (N=number of turns, A=flux surface area of the coil) is set equal to the reference round mono loop coil. Smaller RX coils will pickup less noise and we can increase the gain of the RX. This gain is taken into account in the relation tables.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CoilComp2-ATX-Davor-DD-IB-Coil-Relation.gif
Views:	1
Size:	21.8 KB
ID:	337563

    Now the comparison figures:
    The new DD-IB coil is 10" DD-IB ("ATX Coil"/Davor Coil)

    Coil Comparison (Calculated Response Ratio to Reference Coil)
    © 2013 by Aziz Ögüt. All Rights Reserved. 13-Sept-2013
    Reference Coil: 300 µH Round Mono Loop Coil (SNR normalized to reference coil)
    10" Mono Loop Round Coil (Reference)
    10" Mono Loop Round Coil (Reference) 10" Double-D Induction Balanced Round Coil 10" Concentric Co-planar Induction Balanced Round Coil (0.5) 10" DD-IB ("ATX Coil"/Davor Coil)
    Target Depth [inch] Target Depth [cm] Reference Target Response Voltage [V] Relation to Reference Relation to Reference Relation to Reference Relation to Reference
    1 2,5 0,224542198972 1,000 1,195 1,917 2,146
    2 5,1 0,091886134762 1,000 0,930 3,104 1,996
    3 7,6 0,054306336547 1,000 0,771 2,631 1,336
    4 10,2 0,030898542907 1,000 0,703 2,126 1,031
    5 12,7 0,017017280632 1,000 0,673 1,786 0,887
    6 15,2 0,009367598034 1,000 0,657 1,563 0,810
    7 17,8 0,005246952754 1,000 0,647 1,414 0,765
    8 20,3 0,003016466978 1,000 0,641 1,310 0,736
    9 22,9 0,001785876774 1,000 0,636 1,236 0,716
    10 25,4 0,001089303660 1,000 0,633 1,182 0,702
    11 27,9 0,000683797786 1,000 0,631 1,140 0,692
    12 30,5 0,000440986616 1,000 0,629 1,108 0,684
    13 33,0 0,000291588066 1,000 0,628 1,083 0,678
    14 35,6 0,000197277483 1,000 0,627 1,063 0,673
    15 38,1 0,000136302660 1,000 0,626 1,047 0,669
    16 40,6 0,000095999056 1,000 0,625 1,033 0,666
    17 43,2 0,000068809924 1,000 0,625 1,022 0,664
    18 45,7 0,000050120032 1,000 0,624 1,012 0,662
    19 48,3 0,000037048248 1,000 0,624 1,004 0,660
    20 50,8 0,000027758749 1,000 0,624 0,997 0,658
    21 53,3 0,000021059197 1,000 0,623 0,991 0,657
    22 55,9 0,000016161269 1,000 0,623 0,985 0,656
    23 58,4 0,000012535036 1,000 0,623 0,981 0,655
    24 61,0 0,000009818718 1,000 0,623 0,977 0,654
    25 63,5 0,000007761740 1,000 0,622 0,973 0,653
    26 66,0 0,000006188195 1,000 0,622 0,970 0,652
    27 68,6 0,000004973029 1,000 0,622 0,967 0,652
    28 71,1 0,000004026289 1,000 0,622 0,964 0,651
    29 73,7 0,000003282546 1,000 0,622 0,962 0,651
    30 76,2 0,000002693717 1,000 0,622 0,960 0,650
    There are more means to induction balance the coils:
    - varying the distance gap
    - offsetting the center position (like the usual DD coil)
    - rotating (along the z-axis) one of the coils (either TX or RX)

    The inner diameter and the distance gap is critical. There are inner diameters, which can't be induction balanced. The shown example should give you an indication, which allows an induction balance condition.


    Cheers,
    Aziz

    Comment


    • #32
      Excel Simulation Data (Zipped)

      For your convenience of course.

      Excel simulation data (zipped):
      CoilComp5(CoilCMP2)-06.zip


      Cheers,
      Aziz,
      the "World Leader in Coil Technology" *LOL*
      having some beer now (excuse me please)

      Comment


      • #33
        Nice. So there is some potential to it. Wonder how it does on difficult ground.

        I had a little vine myself

        Comment


        • #34
          Something like this ?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	atx.Davor.DD.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	169.5 KB
ID:	337580

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Davor View Post
            Nice. So there is some potential to it. Wonder how it does on difficult ground.

            I had a little vine myself
            The "World's Best IB Coil" is still the "Tophat"(c)(r)(tm) coil. *LOL*

            BTW, watch the patent sites for new registered patents. I wouldn't be wondered if someone comes up with a new coil patent. *LOL*

            Cheers,
            Aziz

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by 6666 View Post
              Something like this ?

              [ATTACH]26210[/ATTACH]
              Yep!

              Comment


              • #37
                How do we know the middle bump goes outward I paused the video and can't see. What would happen if the bump was inwards (maybe a test for Aziz). I take it this design will be easier to pinpoint as well as sensitive to small items.

                Comment


                • #38
                  You wouldn't be able to balance such coil. It does not matter that much for PI as it would for CW, but such direction would also reduce the field in the middle, so pinpointing would be seriously hurt.

                  Double field coils have the inner coil working in a same direction as the outer to enhance the field in a middle, and it is a good thing, so I'd say doing the opposite does not make much sense.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Davor View Post
                    You wouldn't be able to balance such coil. It does not matter that much for PI as it would for CW, but such direction would also reduce the field in the middle, so pinpointing would be seriously hurt.

                    Double field coils have the inner coil working in a same direction as the outer to enhance the field in a middle, and it is a good thing, so I'd say doing the opposite does not make much sense.
                    Cheer for the explanation. Now I understand. Thought there must be a simple reason why the other possibility had not been mentioned.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Hi all,

                      thank you for your great interest guys. Glad to see, that the zipped Excel file has been downloaded 20 times.

                      Cheers,
                      Aziz
                      PS: To the forum-trolls:
                      "The World Leader in Coil and Metal Detecting Technology!"(c)(r)(tm) *LOL*

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        21 turns.
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          DD coil with CC characteristic (EM field shape).

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by 6666 View Post
                            21 turns.
                            Nice 6666,

                            well done.

                            Note, that if you can't initially induction balance, you can bend the coil further to meet the IB condition. The inner coil half could be made slightly smaller (first trial) or slightly larger. Vary the distance gap. Or try to i.b. like the standard DD coil. Or rotate one of the coils slightly at the center axis of the coil arrangement.

                            Cheers,
                            Aziz

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              What are you think about garret atx and minelab gpx 500. Which is the best?

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by dinyeper View Post
                                What are you think about garret atx and minelab gpx 500. Which is the best?
                                please be more accurate with your request what better. you are on forum of White's Electronics Company representatives.

                                the best is TDI. you know now why.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X