If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The betting office has just opened.
Who is saying/betting:
1. It works but bad. No benefit.
2. It works a treat.
3. No, it can't work. Never ever!
4. Aziz!, please give up the stuff!
5. The total thermo nuclear melt-down is coming..
6. Nice, but my amplifier works better.
7. You can't beat Mr. Candy! No way!
8. Aziz, go to the hell!
9. Yep, you have won the great prize!
10. You can't win the great prize! My d1ck is longer.
*LOL*
See the other forum for the first test results...
Cheers,
Aziz
i would say
9. Yep, you have won the great prize! (one virtual 6-pack of my favourit köstritzer black beer)
because you are some kind of a crazy rocket scientist and you do what you say
No, I say Aziz has this time made a actual detector, not some simulation done on a computer program. Show that I am right Aziz and post up the detector that only took you 2 days to make. A picture would show all the naysayers how you are the real thing.
Can you believe me, when I state, that two parallel 2N2222 are performing like a LM394 (both transistors parallel)?
They achieve ~ 0.72 nV/sqrt(Hz) input referred noise density (measured).
I'm very close to my goal. The "World's Quietest Metal Detector Front-End"(c)(r)(tm). *LOL*
Some older RF transistors, like 2N4427, 2N3866, MRF 237 style are also good candidates.
Thanks Tepco, could be a trial worth.
BTW, the 2 x BC337-40 is achieving 0.8 nV/sqrt(Hz) with NE5534 as op-amp. You don't need expensive op-amps. The NE5534 will do it very well. I'm right now below 50 Cents for the ultra low noise core parts (2 x BJT + op-amp). It's going to be ultra low cost as well.
hi aziz good work man, take a look at the ti tle2072, were using it as a 072 replacement and so far it is better, 3 reasons are dip pack, direct replacement, but more important its on sample at the moment so users here can get free samples.
check out the d sheet.
hi aziz good work man, take a look at the ti tle2072, were using it as a 072 replacement and so far it is better, 3 reasons are dip pack, direct replacement, but more important its on sample at the moment so users here can get free samples.
check out the d sheet.
Thanks for your hint sinclairuser. But we are using a bi-polar technology not j-fet. We are using low impedance (low resistor) signal sources (coils have a very small resistance). BTW, the tle2072 has much much more input noise density.
Cheers,
Aziz
I just have tested the TL071 (CP) (replaced the NE5534). No measurable difference to NE5534 at all. You can take (almost) every op-amp. The noise contribution to the transistor stage isn't much relevant.
Aziz
It seems, that I have been conned with my BC550C transistors. It looks like, that a f$kin ba $ tard has relabeled them (clearly visible!!!).
I have to buy a new batch of them and test them. I think, I've got a cheap relabeled BJT's.
That would probably explain the poor noise performance.
Aziz
It seems, that I have been conned with my BC550C transistors. It looks like, that a f$kin ba $ tard has relabeled them (clearly visible!!!).
I have to buy a new batch of them and test them. I think, I've got a cheap relabeled BJT's.
That would probably explain the poor noise performance.
Aziz
My so-called "BC550C" is performing like a BC547C! It will probably perform like a BC546 or other cheap NPN too.
Ba $t @ rd$$$$$!
Comment