Metal detector experiments.

[daverave]

...

very impressive

[M.D. prototypes]

Experiment with masking behavior.

Experiment with masking behavior on gold and silver.

[M.D. prototypes]

Second experiment with "iron masking behavior".

[ODM]

Where are your details on this project? Please don't make this another "ultimate detector", we have had enough of those

[M.D. prototypes]

Where are your details on this project? Please don't make this another "ultimate detector", we have had enough of those

Sorry, but I think you're in the wrong forum.

This is not the part of the forum called "projects" and also not the Schematics forum,
"If you have a schematic to share, post it here. Please read the Intro post for rules on posting schematics."

This is the: Tech Forum
"General tech discussions on all types of metal detectors: VLF, PI, 2-box, BFO, off-resonance, PLL, etc. Questions, ideas, and anything else that moves you".

I want to ask you a question.
Why do you think that the Deus without Disc and a good ground balance adjustment has a huge iron masking problem?

I think this might be a good Tech Forum question.

[ODM]

I understand if you don't want to share the details publicly, but why make a fuss of it here, otherwise? As far as Deus is concerned, there are many reasons why it would have problems with discrimination and masking, not the least of which would be dynamic range issues and the least of which would be coil configuration (excluding internal electronics integration). But do entertain us, here or preferably in the Deus thread where discussions regarding Deus should go, about what is the problem with Deus and why.

I want to ask you a question: Why do you post these under the tech forum and not under marketing forum, if you need to resort this empty rhetoric and reverse questions games, instead of offering even the most primitive details in discussion of technology?

Even the people who feared patent trolls the most, including those who actually patented their findings, shared at least the most basic details of their findings. Bugwhiskers, Moodz, others who faced problems with litigation. You must understand that this looks like the marketplace jester playing with three cups and marble. If we play that "hiding the marble in cups" game, we risk the chance of actually exploring the marble itself from multiple angles, and noticing cracks in the marble that would prevent it from becoming a true challenger instead of another hype hit.
So are you here to hype a secret project, or to discuss technology?

[M.D. prototypes]

This has nothing to do with marketing because this detector will never reach the market. He's not for sale!

You had to be glad that you can see videos from amateurs detectors without tricks that can compete with commercial detectors.

Regarding the Deus this is not an isolated case of the Deus, various detectors have this problem.
So, let's talk about the technical problem and not about brands.

The points you mention may all be true, but there are several points more.
One of them is (deliberately) still apply a Disc/notch and account customers that he seeks with no Disc. How would you call that?.........

I let not treat me like my father "Nupi" has been treated here.

I think you're are one more of those "Schematic hunters" and not interested in technology.

Oh I see, you also making problems with the tread "Makro Racer" from our well respected Funfinder .

Go somewhere else play Geotech policeman.

[Teleno]

I think you're are one more of those "Schematic hunters" and not interested in technology.
...
Go somewhere else play Geotech policeman.

Nobody is asking you for schematics, what the hell, you flaunt some beeping black box and refuse to answer any inquiries about the technology involved.

It seems you yourself have no intention of talking about technology. You're just busy bashing a competitor. That's not the purpose of the Tech forum.

[M.D. prototypes]

"you flaunt some beeping black box" Do not say that, jealousy is poison for the soul.

"and refuse to answer any inquiries about the technology involved". You're wrong! #13

"It seems you yourself have no intention of talking about technology". You're wrong!

"You're just busy bashing a competitor". Wrong again!.
It's not a competitor and we bashing nothing. We only show a problem. You ar apparently not interested.!?!? Why

Have a nice weekend

[Teleno]

"you flaunt some beeping black box" Do not say that, jealousy is poison for the soul.

"and refuse to answer any inquiries about the technology involved". You're wrong! #13

"It seems you yourself have no intention of talking about technology". You're wrong!

"You're just busy bashing a competitor". Wrong again!.
It's not a competitor and we bashing nothing. We only show a problem. You ar apparently not interested.!?!? Why

Have a nice weekend

Again, refusing to engage in any technological exchange at all.

It is now apparent that you came here just to feel important (nobody loves you?) by trying to make people "jealous". Good lord! Go find a psychiatrist, the Tech forum is not for group therapy either.

[M.D. prototypes]

Again, refusing to engage in any technological exchange at all.

It is now apparent that you came here just to feel important (nobody loves you?) by trying to make people "jealous". Good lord! Go find a psychiatrist, the Tech forum is not for group therapy either.

"It is now apparent that you came here just to feel important" wrong again!. I am important.

"(nobody loves you?)" wrong again! The whole world loves me. Admit it, you love me too.

"Go find a psychiatrist" (find???) again wrong! I have the same psychiatrist where you go. His name is Peter are you already forgotten?

"the Tech forum is not for group therapy either". Please,don't say that. Now you've ruined my weekend. I thought it was a forum for intensive therapy.

You have show me that you not care about Geotech.
Only your damaged childish ego is important for you.

I respond no longer at your response because this is what does not belong to the Tech Forum.

Have a nice weekend.

[Teleno]

"It is now apparent that you came here just to feel important" wrong again!. I am important.

"(nobody loves you?)" wrong again! The whole world loves me. Admit it, you love me too.

"Go find a psychiatrist" (find???) again wrong! I have the same psychiatrist where you go. His name is Peter are you already forgotten?

"the Tech forum is not for group therapy either". Please,don't say that. Now you've ruined my weekend. I thought it was a forum for intensive therapy.

You have show me that you not care about Geotech.
Only your damaged childish ego is important for you.

I respond no longer at your response because this is what does not belong to the Tech Forum.

Have a nice weekend.

Here, I found a forum better suited to your needs. Anoniem hulp bij psychische problemen.

[kt315]

i would to ask a moderator to put down your thread in adverts to - http://www.geotech1.com/forums/forum...ee-Advertising
your messages are really blank and bringing nothing.

[Koala]

I always laugh when I see nail coin nail on YouTube. Has anyone tested it themselves. Given the right coin and nail both my vintage IDX and Bandido pass with easy. Only because the signal from the coin is greater than the nail. No magic here just normal detector. Change the nail for a rusty forged one and the coin for a cut half and you will get a completely different result.

[Qiaozhi]

I always laugh when I see nail coin nail on YouTube. Has anyone tested it themselves. Given the right coin and nail both my vintage IDX and Bandido pass with easy. Only because the signal from the coin is greater than the nail. No magic here just normal detector. Change the nail for a rusty forged one and the coin for a cut half and you will get a completely different result.

Also, if you place the coin at a lower depth than the nails, you will be amazed which detectors cannot see the coin; whereas they could when all three items were in the same plane.