Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Magnetometer sensor question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Magnetometer sensor question

    Hi folks,

    I been doing some testing with magnetometers, specifically the LSM303DLHC. This sensor has several ranges, with the most sensitive being +/- 1.3 Gauss, full scale. It looks like that gives you a resolution of 63.5 nano Teslas per count.

    Is this a high enough resolution to make useful ground surveys with. or does it need more sensitivity?

    I know that at my latitude (37 deg N), the earth's magnetic field is about 50,000 nano Teslas. In doing a ground survey for an area, say the size of a field (1 acre or 4000 m^2), would that resolution produce any useful results for large ground anomalies like a cache in the ground? I understand it probably would not be obviously visible, but if plotted in color, it might show differently I'm guessing.

    Just curious. Its an interesting chip, typically used with drones and UAV's, but I'm wondering if there could be any applications for MD. Perhaps if multiple sensors could be used as a form of crude "oversampling".

  • #2
    The Earth's magnetic field is about 50,000nT or 0.5Gauss. For the search you intend, you need about 10nT resolution.
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #3
      Yeah, I'm familiar with the magnetic field numbers, but I'm more interested in mapping "additional" magnetic anomalies versus voids or missing magnetic field strength. So, I'm wondering, even though I might not have the sensitivity to characterize the magnetic field by itself, it may have the sensitivity to detect objects which add to the magnetic field, such as large iron objects like meteorites or caches. I'm also wondering if many sensors at once would give useful, unrealized information, not typical with your typical, single super sensitive sensors.

      Comment


      • #4
        http://www.precisemag.com/products/performance/

        Comment


        • #5
          Wow. Thanks for that. That was exactly the kind of info I was looking at. Based on some of the images, it looks like a 2nT resolution is needed, for the desired targets being looked at, i.e 1kg @ 1M, 1 ton at 15M, 10T @ 35M. However, if my range is less, then the 65 nT resolution may not be a problem. That's a 30X sensitivity, which to me would possibly correlate to 30X less range (not size which requires more sensitivity). So instead of 1Kg @ 1M, I could expect 1Kg @ 33mm. Conservatively.

          However, based on benchtop testing, I could easily see a 1/2kg target at 75mm-90mm.

          The PPM module shown is a single sensor. An array of 10-20 MEMs sensors like the LSM303DLHC might be actually more sensitive. The sensitivity of the PPM is dependant and the target signal setting off the detection, even if the scan was slightly off top dead center of the target in order to not miss. A less sensitive sensor looking at a finer portion of ground may actually be better in terms of required sensitivity.

          I have a platform for this testing anyway. It looks like to me that this is indeed something I need to verify if it will work or not with a real prototype. I will post any results I may get in the meantime.

          Comment


          • #6
            no comment
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8zqqeUWKYM

            Comment


            • #7
              That is amazing. thanks for sharing. 200pT! They even have a multi sensor mux board to prevent interference..
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #8
                Nothing does not surprise me here is in terms of a differential sensor who scored the extra sensitivity
                if he moves one neodymium magnet can be detected at 20 meters !
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8zqqeUWKYM

                Comment

                Working...
                X