XFERRA

[enjoykin4]

Привет !!

Hello Moodz and all other t.hunters. Very nice thread. A lot of research jobs has done and shoud be done more further.

1st. I want to tell one secret to all. There exist a SECOND MAGNETIC FIELD. Not its not a Vector type like usual B-filed, but it is a Scalar type. It means it is not derivation of B-filed, but quite a new and unknown Magnetic filed. It can't be shielded at all. What is quite excellent stuff, because using it we can do a very-very deeep penetration in all kind of Natural Media. (I like using Tesla slang). The fist man who had discovered it was a famous Nikolai Tesla more than 100 years ago. Keep in mind almost all his patents (and not only his) about it were highly classified - because that special Scalar Field is a source of Infinite Free Energy and can control Elemental forcres - remember famous (Colorado Springs Wardenclyffe) experiments and Tunguska Event. Big breaktrough in Tesla Scalar physics was made Russian experimental physicist Gennady Nikolaev about 30...40 years ago. And yes - Scalar magnetic filed transmission is reality and working especially if you are placed in deep mine ore under the ground.
My idea is to implement XFERRA technology in Hyper Deep and Sensitive Pulse Induction metal detection art. So folks if you are interesting we can talk about a Second Magnetic Fileds (call it Tesla filed) COLD current(s) and influence of cold currents on all kind of media in the soil, water and air - especialy gold nuggets...silver coins.... and all kind of jewerly.

Reg.
Enjoykin4


The Proof - XFERRA
Omsk, 644041, Russia
http://www.xferra.com

[Qiaozhi]

Enjoykin4 - Your post was put into moderation because it is your first post and it contains an image. This is part of our anti-spam protection.
I have now approved your post, and moved it from "The Moodz Detector" thread.

I'm not sure whether this topic really belongs at www.longrangelocators.com, as discussions of scalar waves, free energy and secret Tesla technology is not relevant to the Geotech forum. However, since your intent is to develop a super-deep PI, and not the usual type of LRL, I will let it remain here for the time being and see how things progress.

Please keep the discussions focussed on whether this approach has any practical value. A lot of these ideas are highly speculative. The fact that a particular company is selling products based on scalar waves does not prove anything. There are a lot of companies (we all know who they are) selling gizmos based on so-called "ionic" detection and even dowsing. But none of this proves that they actually work.

[Koala]

I am at confused dot com

The link uses standard low frequency waves to penetrate rock. The same technology that has been use for the last 40 years.

[Qiaozhi]

I am at confused dot com

The link uses standard low frequency waves to penetrate rock. The same technology that has been use for the last 40 years.

I agree. Having looked through their complete website, I can see no reference to either scalar waves or Tesla.

Enjoykin4 - where did you get the idea that this is some sort of secret technology?

[ivconic]

"...There exist a SECOND MAGNETIC FIELD. Not its not a Vector type like usual B-filed, but it is a Scalar type..."

No, it's LSB!

[kt315]

ML cry. they do not see where here and what to patent they are absolutely defenseless contra strong trolling

[Teleno]

Rediscovering MW radio, LSB and USB. No tesla, no mystery fields.

[Orbit]

Come on, you who know and write something more on the waves and communication between two transceiver one on the surface of and second 10 kilometers under ground ! And do not slam one communication above and below the surface or under water !
http://www.mineradios.com/ If all we know then it is easy to make detector the coin reveals to 5 meters deep this is nonsense ! behold, I to light a ten light-emitting diodes without battery with the help of the oscillator and broadcast electromagnetic radiation but I'm not sure that it is the wireless transmission energy !

[Qiaozhi]

This was written in 2002 ->
http://caves.org.uk/radio/comms_in_caves.html
http://caves.org.uk/radio/bookinfo.html
http://www.lulu.com/shop/david-gibso...-11253100.html
It appears that the claims made for the XFerra product are somewhat unbelievable.

[kt315]

where did you get the idea that this is some sort of secret technology? -- russians have much ideas 0_o https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsio...(pseudoscience)

[Qiaozhi]

I've just been examining this subject a bit more closely, and found a caver / radio enthusiast who has built a radio that could penetrate 700m of rock. Also, the 1km claim of the XFerra equipment is for "message mode" only (not voice). So perhaps the claims are not so outlandish after all. In which case, it doesn't seem to be anything to get excited about, and most likely has no relevance to metal detecting.

[Skippy]

I suppose it's all about the noise, and the desired bandwidth. The Hartley-Tuller-Shannon equation etc. If you want to pluck a signal from the noise, use a lower bandwidth. So presumably the "text message" is sent at a low data rate (and probably with a fair bit of error detection/correction information, too). Unless you 'sample' the voice signal, and send it over the radio link at 1/4 normal speed, for example, you are forced to require at least 2.5KHz bandwidth.

[Orbit]

Yes drilled to the rocks and expel the radio antenna so everything is possibl I worked transmitters from a few kilowatts I worked bands UHF and I tried and very low frequency it is very difficult when it is in front of the say soaring mountains have noises how the waves bounce off of mountains rock or eventually from striking other reflective area and somehow feel in the receiver ,It applies to surface below surface it's very complicated !

[ivconic]

I suppose it's all about the noise, and the desired bandwidth. The Hartley-Tuller-Shannon equation etc. If you want to pluck a signal from the noise, use a lower bandwidth. So presumably the "text message" is sent at a low data rate (and probably with a fair bit of error detection/correction information, too). Unless you 'sample' the voice signal, and send it over the radio link at 1/4 normal speed, for example, you are forced to require at least 2.5KHz bandwidth.

Rang: 0,8-5 MHz (custom available frequency)
0,9-1,1 MHz (underground band
1,8-2,0 MHz (ham radio band)
Modulation: LSB (standart), USB (custom)