ive been reading about reverse discrimination and i wonder if its really a good way to discriminate seeing it just uses a later sample...any thoughts on this please.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
REVERSE DISCRIMINATION
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by daverave View Postive been reading about reverse discrimination and i wonder if its really a good way to discriminate seeing it just uses a later sample...any thoughts on this please.
-
Re: Pulsed IB-VLF Detector instead of PI-Detector.
Posted by: Dave Emery (---.sip.clt.bellsouth.net)
Date: March 3, 2005 07:13PM
Aziz,
Eric Foster made a true PI with a balanced searchcoil which could discriminate over twenty years ago. The problem is that the reactive component suffers from ground effect. Using filters such as a motion VLF will result in a major reduction of depth over a regular PI. In short it has been done and may well prove to be a method for the future once the problems involved with such designs are solved. The dream is to find a reliable method of making a regular PI discriminate like a VLF using only a mono coil.
----------
Hi Dave, When you say "discriminate", do you mean determining if the target is ferrous or non-ferrous, or are you referring to distinguishing between different kinds of non-ferrous targets, such as zip-tabs and coins?
Allan
-----
Allan,
I am talking about a fully variable discrimination control such as the control found on a VLF. Maybe even a notch discriminate control to boot! The detector Eric made was ferrous / non ferrous only but it goes to show you how far ahead he has been for so long. He made that detector over twenty years ago!!!
Comment
-
im really thinking about ferrous discrimination which is the biggest problem for a pulse machine to reject...when i get a target i normally turn the delay control up some what...and if the signal is still strong then i see it as junk like iron...but i know its not that black and white.
Comment
-
Originally posted by daverave View Postim really thinking about ferrous discrimination which is the biggest problem for a pulse machine to reject...when i get a target i normally turn the delay control up some what...and if the signal is still strong then i see it as junk like iron...but i know its not that black and white.
Paramagnetic materials (ferrous) increase the coil's inductance L. Diamagnetic (Copper, Silver, Gold) decrease L.
A simple inductance measurment can produce a discriminating output. For example, you can use a "test period" in which you measure the coil's inductance using a constant voltage source. You measure the time it takes for the coil to reach a test current I. This time is proportional to the inductance. Or you measure the coil's natural frequency making it oscillate. You compare it to the measurements in the absence of a target.
Comment
-
Yes this CAN be done and it's not as difficult as you think.
For Eric's version, he missed using a reference pulse BEFORE the main Tx to "sound out" the coil. I would not seek to demean his Genius in any manner, Eric thinks in a very linear fashion (God Bless him) and sometimes that can be a curse rether than a blessing.
BIG HINT: Think B-H hysteresis curves. I'll leave the rest for you to experiment with but I will say I've got a method which shows GREAT promise in the field. Go look at some of my other PI related posts to see what I mean.
Comment
-
-
as far that i understand i thought ferrous disc could only be done using 2D coils...i know detectors like the chance and others using microprocessors can in some way discriminate out ferrous...and from what i can see from some of the eric foster designs he uses extra samples to get discrimination in some way...not sure if any can discriminate to full depth ???
Comment
-
Originally posted by daverave View Posti really do not want to use two coils to get ferrous discrimination...just wanna know if possible with mono coil....i know eric foster designs used extra samples but i wonder how good they were at rejecting iron of whatever size.
Comment
Comment