If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Tesoro adjusts phase at a switching level, so Disc channel phase is not fixed. Therefore you may use VDI, but the numbers shown on it will depend upon your Disc. adjustment.
No problem.
Have in mind that it will give meaningful reading only at a single position of discrimination potentiometer.
A VDI is reading an angle between two demodulated vectors. While GB is mostly the same for nearly all VLF detectors, at least on easy terrains, Tesoro shifts phase at the switching detector level. Fisher 1265 descendants do discrimination a bit differently. The discrimination phase there is fixed on the switching detectors, and it only gets shifted by addition of GB-ed demodulated signal in a baseband demodulated path. This variant gives more consistent and straightforward VDI solution, provided you take phases prior to the discrimination potentiometer.
What approach is better? I'd say both are basically the same in a classic VLF. The later approach is far better solution for a quadrature demodulation followed by a microcontroller, as the VLF frequency part is completely invariant for the low frequency processing.
Although I'm very happy with my IGSL, which is basically a Tesoro approach, I see many advantages of a Fisher 1265 approach.
Man I would love a VDI on my Compadre. Hunt in all metal looking for small chains and micro jewelry while being able to see whats beeping would be great. And it has the fixed GB.
Comment