"...This myth is Busted
Can machines that don't air test well, go deeper in the soil ?
No absolute Crap !! this is scientifically impossible if a machine air tests badly it will detect badly in the soil despite what you read on metal detecting forums and some manufacturers literature.
However some machines that air test better can loose a higher percentage of depth in the soil around 30% depending on what type of search coil is used.
If you suspect these results are wrong, please go out there and do the buried coins test for yourself.
I think you will be amazed!!!!..."
This is quote taken from here:
http://www.garysdetecting.co.uk/hoard_test.htm
Fancy! I tell ya!
Almost to agree with.
And also sounds pretty sane and logical too.
And yes; it is true... BUT only in case we are talking about freshly buried targets in soil.
In such case yes it is true; machine will perform worse on target in soil than in air.
But what if target is lying there in soil for 2000 years?
We already talked about that several times in the past.
What about so called "hallo" effect?
Is it "hallo" or "echo" or whatever else; not really important, important is that it is a fact that it exists and it helps significantly in detection.
Well... listen... it is really not my fault because some people are so handicapped by not having the sites and opportunities to search for real Archeology.
They are handicapped because they can't search for 2000 years old targets in soil.
While at the same time lot of us can. Simply it is a matter of fact where are you residing and do you have or not such sites.
Nobody's fault actually. Just objective circumstances.
And from the perspective of someone who can search on such sites; i claim that most of the existing models (if not all) are able to perform better on such targets than in air.
Again... this not supposed to be taken as ultimate case, 100%.
It also depends on climatic conditions and period of a year and day.
But in most of the cases it will be the rule actually.
Now... you may ask what this is got to do with anything... what's the point?
Well... point is very simple and clear.
Artificially prepared testing conditions are not reflecting the truth and reality on real sites.
I am buying detectors to search for real and precious targets, the real Archeology.
I am not wasting my money on toys to play with on testing beds.
For that purpose i am already having Minelab simulator, splendid little md game!
What interests me mostly at metal detector is simple fact; how it will perform in reality, on real sites that i am having here at home.
I am not interested at all of how it "should" or would perform on some artificially made testing bed somewhere in some backyard in UK.
Simple as that.
That's the horrible "the other way around" and "thesis switching" which some people are trying to establish as ultimate (and only) truth.
Well... you can fool out some novice and beginner; but you can't fool me.
Besides, i am not writing all this for the sake of my own awareness. I don't need that.
I am writing this only for the sake of global md community awareness, especially to help novices and beginners here.
Sometimes i really feel like Don Quixote, by putting enormous efforts and all my nerves to stand for the real truth.
Can machines that don't air test well, go deeper in the soil ?
No absolute Crap !! this is scientifically impossible if a machine air tests badly it will detect badly in the soil despite what you read on metal detecting forums and some manufacturers literature.
However some machines that air test better can loose a higher percentage of depth in the soil around 30% depending on what type of search coil is used.
If you suspect these results are wrong, please go out there and do the buried coins test for yourself.
I think you will be amazed!!!!..."
This is quote taken from here:
http://www.garysdetecting.co.uk/hoard_test.htm
Fancy! I tell ya!
Almost to agree with.
And also sounds pretty sane and logical too.
And yes; it is true... BUT only in case we are talking about freshly buried targets in soil.
In such case yes it is true; machine will perform worse on target in soil than in air.
But what if target is lying there in soil for 2000 years?
We already talked about that several times in the past.
What about so called "hallo" effect?
Is it "hallo" or "echo" or whatever else; not really important, important is that it is a fact that it exists and it helps significantly in detection.
Well... listen... it is really not my fault because some people are so handicapped by not having the sites and opportunities to search for real Archeology.
They are handicapped because they can't search for 2000 years old targets in soil.
While at the same time lot of us can. Simply it is a matter of fact where are you residing and do you have or not such sites.
Nobody's fault actually. Just objective circumstances.
And from the perspective of someone who can search on such sites; i claim that most of the existing models (if not all) are able to perform better on such targets than in air.
Again... this not supposed to be taken as ultimate case, 100%.
It also depends on climatic conditions and period of a year and day.
But in most of the cases it will be the rule actually.
Now... you may ask what this is got to do with anything... what's the point?
Well... point is very simple and clear.
Artificially prepared testing conditions are not reflecting the truth and reality on real sites.
I am buying detectors to search for real and precious targets, the real Archeology.
I am not wasting my money on toys to play with on testing beds.
For that purpose i am already having Minelab simulator, splendid little md game!
What interests me mostly at metal detector is simple fact; how it will perform in reality, on real sites that i am having here at home.
I am not interested at all of how it "should" or would perform on some artificially made testing bed somewhere in some backyard in UK.
Simple as that.
That's the horrible "the other way around" and "thesis switching" which some people are trying to establish as ultimate (and only) truth.
Well... you can fool out some novice and beginner; but you can't fool me.
Besides, i am not writing all this for the sake of my own awareness. I don't need that.
I am writing this only for the sake of global md community awareness, especially to help novices and beginners here.
Sometimes i really feel like Don Quixote, by putting enormous efforts and all my nerves to stand for the real truth.
Comment