Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hey electronic gurus, I need some help.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hey electronic gurus, I need some help.

    Is there more to sensitivity than LCR? I built a 21 inch coil and an 18 inch coil and both have the same problem. I'm getting a very low conductive signal way over on the ferrous side of my ID screen. I have two wild guesses at what the problem is, not enough shielding or my coil is too sensitive and the machine can't balance away the ground.

    I used nickel shielding paint on the 21 inch coil, it was quite conductive, I easily obtained continuity with the probes 21 inches apart.

    I used carbon shielding paint on the 18 inch coil and laid it on thick, yet I could not get continuity even with the probes only 1/2 inch apart.

    I had thought the nickel shielding was causing this low ferrous signal i.e. too conductive but since I have the same problem with the coil using carbon shielding it can't be that the shielding is too conductive. I know this because with no shielding the RX square wave is distorted due to EMI on both coils on the scope. The nickel shielding cleared this right up giving me a nice sharp square wave on RX just like my factory coils. But RX is still distorted on the coil using the carbon paint and I laid it on quite thick so since the factory coil RX is undistorted then the carbon shielded coil which is still distorted is not shielded well enough and so the problem is not that the shielding is too conductive since this coil has the same low ferrous signal problem.

    It could be that its not conductive enough...on the coil that I used the nickel paint it actually quiets down and gives me a threshold if sitting still, I don't get the low ferrous signal until I move it. On the 18 inch coil with the carbon shielding I get the low ferrous signal even when its sitting still on the ground.

    Okay so maybe my shielding is not conductive enough, maybe but thats not my first choice. Lets say instead that my coils are too sensitive, if so I'm missing something important because my 18 inch coil is wound to yield factory specs inductance, capacitance, and resistance, they are right on. But my coils have a much higher Q and I'm probably using a heavier guage wire on the RX coils than the factory coils. Maybe I need to wind them sloppy or use a finer guage on the RX? Is there more to sensitivity than LCR?

    By the way I have a factory 15 inch coil which runs fine at higher sens settings at the same test site and its not the machine since I changed coils and hunted for a couple hours with no issues.

    Any thoughts would be appreciated.

  • #2
    Re: Hey electronic gurus, I need some help.

    Charles, Try LITZ (stranded) cable for the RX and TX coils.

    The reason being is that at the higher frequencies you are probably getting too much phase shift and this is causing the machine confusion.

    The OTHER problem might be in your head amplifier. You need to PHASE SHIFT the entire RX waveform to get the timings right within the Exploder.

    ML use this circuit as a cop-out on the coil design. No problems, it just easier to do it that way. To correct any GROUP DELAY phase errors due to the fact that it's difficult, well OK, IMPOSSIBLE to balance the coil across the whole 100KHz range.

    If you simulate the ML head circuit using Electronics Workbench or something similar, then simulate yours, pay PARTICULAR attention to the phase shifts involved.

    At the multiple frequencies involved, the RX waveform might LOOK OK to the naked eye, but I bet thee are all sorts of horrible things going on in there.

    You really need a Spectrum Analyser, and a Vector Scope to find out what is happenening, UNLESS you just get lucky.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Hey electronic gurus, I need some help.

      There are no amps in the Explorer coils, just a couple coils of wire. The phaze stuff is interesting and I'll look at that but I should have noted that the coil works perfectly on the shop bench, great depth and properly ID's different metals. Its only when you place it on the ground that I have problems. Don't know if that helps narrow things down.

      I don't know much about this phaze shift stuff clearly, have not been able to find much info on that on the internet.

      Comment


      • #4
        On the frequency thing...

        There appears to be only 3 frequencies on my scope which repeat over and over if you look at a longer period. I have heard that ML monitors harmonics of those core freq to yeild the advertised 28 frequencies.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Hey electronic gurus, I need some help.

          How did you tune the coil? With Concentric Coils tuning is very important and from reading Reg's Posts when making a DD coil for the PI's tuning them also seems to be important? I have read some info on Concentric Coil Tuning but I haven't found any info on how to tune the DD's.

          HH

          Beachcomber

          Comment

          Working...
          X