Originally posted by dbanner
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
choice for a 18 khz
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by blobber View PostIDX original coil calculation is approximately:
TX 0.6mH/1uF/6.497kHz
RX 35mH/33nF/4.683kHz
So I would try this:
TX 0.6mH/122nF/18.602kHz
RX 35mH/2.7nF/16.372kHz
I am sure, that this will work, but not sure about performance, phase..etc.
tx 0.583mh / 1uf / 5.59khz and rx 36.5mh / 33nf / 5.58khz ...
why is there such a big difference between 18.6 and 16.3 khz? There is something that I do not understand in the calculation and realization of a dd coil ... if you want to explain me it would be really nice .. thank you.
Comment
-
thank you blobber, I will try immediately on an idx test coil.
can you explain to me why it takes a difference of 2 khz between rx and tx? This question is a bit off topic, but I never understood the why not 1khz or 3 or 5 or 10 ..... is this related to the working frequency of the preamp? 2khz for idx? For example?
Comment
-
That is a good question, but unfortunately I can not explain the reason for the difference, maybe some experts here can do this?
I have only noticed, that many VLF detectors are working with this divergence, like IDX, Terminator, SMW, Krot, Fortuna, Quasar and I wonder, why TGSL and Bandido have it to the oposite way. There is TX lower than RX.
Comment
-
thank you blobber for your answer. I ask myself the same question .. why some detectors work with this shift and others not .... but the great specialists of this forum certainly have the answer, dbanner, waltr .... those who can read george overton ..... inside metal ..... it's so easy to send us back to this book ... without telling us the reason ..... I will continue my experimentation and also learn to read.
Comment
Comment