Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Minelab Equinox Challenge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
    OK Geoteckers, here is the TX waveform for the Minelab Equinox:

    [ATTACH]42980[/ATTACH]

    And here is the challenge:

    "How many frequencies does the Equinox use, and what are they?"

    A hint:

    Remember 17 frequency BBS? and 28 frequency FBS? Both were pure marketing hogwash. If you start with the assumption that the Equinox frequency claims made thus far are an adjunct to porcine whole-body cleanliness, you will have less trouble figuring it out.
    Instruction question:
    If a person has an oscilloscope (my old one is dead) and an Equinox 800 what are the steps to measure the frequencies being used?

    Comment


    • #92
      Why ...



      when it is too less complicated to do it all sweet&easy with something like this:
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #93
        All you have to do is to attach just any coil to Mic or Line input of your soundcard and put it parallel to the coil you want to examine...

        Comment


        • #94
          Have you actually tried using a soundcard on the Equinox output? Most sound cards only handle audio frequencies up to about 24kHz, though they can sample much faster, or claim to sample faster, like at 192ksample/sec.
          The maximum Equinox freq we're wanting to see is 39 or 40kHz , and not all cards will even see this frequency, never mind reproduce it in a decent way.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Skippy View Post
            Have you actually tried using a soundcard on the Equinox output? Most sound cards only handle audio frequencies up to about 24kHz, though they can sample much faster, or claim to sample faster, like at 192ksample/sec.
            The maximum Equinox freq we're wanting to see is 39 or 40kHz , and not all cards will even see this frequency, never mind reproduce it in a decent way.

            Good point!
            I am sure for the frequencies up to 20kHz.
            Above that i guess it will depend on the soundcard model.
            ...
            I have not used soundcard for such purposes for quite a while, therefore i can't say that it will do the job in all possible cases.
            I am using mostly this:
            https://www.poscope.com/product/posc...-mega1-bundle/
            ...
            Speaking of "multi-frequency...BBS" and other BS's; i kinda highly suspect that there is signal generated with separate frequency and TX-ed to coil.
            In this particular example i tend to believe that 7.8kz is basic frequency TX-ed to coil.
            All others from the list will be rather harmonics than separate (timed) frequencies, particularly generated by mcu.
            Spectrum analyzer will justify or deny this doubt.
            Problem is that i don't have any of those BBS (BS) toys at my workbench now.
            But i had Explorer II and SE at the time. Similar claims on those models were... you know what!
            Also i believe that ML did nothing significantly better and newer since Explorer SE.
            Seems they just repacking the same "BS" one after another, relabeling them and reducing the dimensions of enclosures.
            Ah yes... rising prices too, of course. Adding jingle&bell or few at each "new" model, just to justify new price.
            To be fair; there is no way me to prove these doubts, i can only assume. (but field experiences do add serious weight on such assumptions)
            Until we see the source code!



            Comment


            • #96
              The way i see all this fuzz on various "BBS, FBS... BS" we've getting hogwashed by ML for years.
              This is just
              "analogue analogy" of whats really going on in the code of MCU.
              Something like that, something similar to that... we don't need to split hair now...

              Click image for larger version

Name:	BBS_BS.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	227.2 KB
ID:	352722

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
                For single freq detectors, a frequency counter is overwhelmingly easier than a spectrum analyzer. I expect his HP has an auto-measure feature, not sure why he doesn't just use that.



                A voltage-mode magnetic field probe will produce an output that is the derivative of the magnetic field being measured, which should be the same waveform as the voltage driving the TX coil. This is what you don't want. What you do want is to measure the actual magnetic field waveform. You can do this with a current-mode probe:

                [ATTACH]44825[/ATTACH]

                The feedback resistor depends on the probe wire resistance but a few hundred ohms up to ~1k is proper. The opamp should have a fair amount of GBW product depending on the highest freq of interest. I tend to shoot for 100kHz or more, so I look for a GBW > 10MHz. You may need a little bit of feedback C for stability, keep it as low as possible. This is a super-simple circuit that heavily depends on the probe design so expect to futz with it a bit.
                (I/T=E/L) I'm thinking I/T excites target not I, I/T is proportional to E. Why do we want to measure I instead of E?

                Comment


                • #98
                  Thanks Ivconic....Virtual Analizer - I think it's a very good pogram, the microphone input-as a probe-to scan the coil detector I used the headphones ..and it's pretty good it works ... it works well on both oscilloscope and frequency analyzers .. You can adjust them to on the notebook sound card a microphone recorder for the 24 bit-96khz range, and amplify the signal appropriately. You will also have to set the settings in the Visual Analyzer - set-fft -size samples to 500-64000 and frequency sapling to 100000 Hz and Bit depht to 16 or 24 bit. Another setting requires an oscilloscope - Approximately x20 and long sample at 0.3 ms and less, and also in the X-axis and Y axis Main Settings and the On-Of- and Average setings..1-200..

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Setings ... Click image for larger version

Name:	Januar 1 iphone 5S 2019 087_DxO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	505.7 KB
ID:	352728

                    Comment


                    • TX Signal program Park 2 Click image for larger version

Name:	Januar 1 iphone 5S 2019 083_DxO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	466.5 KB
ID:	352729

                      Comment


                      • Receiving probe-headphones .. Click image for larger version

Name:	januar 2 iphone5S 2019 004_DxO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	539.1 KB
ID:	352730

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by EL NINO View Post
                          TX Signal program Park 2 [ATTACH]44914[/ATTACH]
                          Looks good. Can you put cursor on the FFT peaks and measure the exact frequencies?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by EL NINO View Post
                            Thanks Ivconic....Virtual Analizer - I think it's a very good pogram, the microphone input-as a probe-to scan the coil detector I used the headphones ..and it's pretty good it works ... it works well on both oscilloscope and frequency analyzers .. You can adjust them to on the notebook sound card a microphone recorder for the 24 bit-96khz range, and amplify the signal appropriately. You will also have to set the settings in the Visual Analyzer - set-fft -size samples to 500-64000 and frequency sapling to 100000 Hz and Bit depht to 16 or 24 bit. Another setting requires an oscilloscope - Approximately x20 and long sample at 0.3 ms and less, and also in the X-axis and Y axis Main Settings and the On-Of- and Average setings..1-200..

                            Comment


                            • Waltr....Yes, it is good to measure ... some frequencies vary in different programs .. On the osciloscope you can compare the shape of the wavelength of the TX wave amplitude in the programs, for the interest I will state that the amplitude of the program beach1a beach2 is smaller and the overloade is reduced to 1/3 of its initial value. I have also measure each individual frequency 5,10,15,20,40Khz in programs-one about the modified sinusoid ..Nice to dig it up and the top of the sinusoid..

                              Comment


                              • 1.Park 2 in3D.. ,2.Gold 2 program 1F 20khz, Click image for larger version

Name:	Januar 3 Iphone5S 2019 008_DxO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	587.0 KB
ID:	352737Click image for larger version

Name:	Januar 3 Iphone5S 2019 012_DxO.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	486.8 KB
ID:	352736

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X