In the flat spiral coil, each successive winding is further out from the first. Would this be the most optimal way to keep interwire capacitance at it's lowest?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Clone Chance Help
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dbanner View PostIn the flat spiral coil, each successive winding is further out from the first. Would this be the most optimal way to keep interwire capacitance at it's lowest?
Attached Files
Comment
-
Yes, Aziz was the man when it came to modelling coils. I wasn't aware he left forum.
In the flat spiral, the space between windings would be attained by using insulated multi- strand wire, the insulation providing the space.
But in the flat spiral coil picture above, 15pF interwire capacitance is pretty darn good, achieved with regular enamel wire.
Comment
-
Comment
-
In the flat spiral, the space between windings would be attained by using insulated multi- strand wire, the insulation providing the space.
But in the flat spiral coil picture above, 15pF interwire capacitance is pretty darn good, achieved with regular enamel wire.
Aziz's instructions was for complete physical separation between turns .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 6666 View PostI find it interesting that Andys coil is apparently slow even though its a flat spiral wind
and the wires are apart
but when you look at another flat spiral wind it only has very low capacitance (15pF)
but the wires are close together.
[ATTACH]43508[/ATTACH]Attached Files
Comment
-
Originally posted by green View PostTried calculating interwire capacitance of above coils. Got a small difference, wondering what I might be doing wrong. I've read winding spiral coil results in low capacitance but shielding adds a lot of capacitance. Other than some tests I've done these are the only ones that list values that I can remember. Does anyone know where a spiral coil listed values that suggested a low SRF or high capacitance? Including picture of the last coil test I did comparing flat vs basket coil. Low capacitance and shielding added very little.
Comment
-
Comment