About a hybrid

[Riss]

Is this detector built by hybrid technology ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ths...ature=youtu.be
This video shows the behavior of the prototype ( search head – 26 centimeters ) of the theme - Thread: Real tests. This is a science ... – Geotech , Tech Forum , 10-26-2018, 08:55 AM . The test is done with a stone of pure magnetite . The black stone from the video weighs 1250 g , its volume ( displacement ) - 0.27 liters - iron ore. ( I'm sure that Fred Flintstone and Barney ( Family Flintstones ) from Bedrock at the time stone Age - they used similar stones for core of prehistoric transformers ) and he has a very strong reactive components visible on the videoclips . The detector is set to medium sensitivity of this video , but even the maximum sensitivity (a coin of 10 euro cents -38-40 centimeters , 2 euros - from 46 to 50 centimeters , very weak signals , test in the air ) is not overloaded by this stone , only gives more noisy reactions to the stone . The video clearly shows some of the most important points on which some conclusions can be drawn , and brings a lot of information about the eye of a professional . It also shows that there is no loss of sensitivity to the targets behind the stone . I tested the model of Minelab – GPX 5000 ( search head was 27 centimeters DD ) with this stone . Of normal sensitivity is impossible completely cut it . You have to significantly reduce the sensitivity of this detector in order to avoid any reaction on the stone . In an induction balance type detector test , the signal from the stone is about 3 times stronger , than that shown on the video vise ( press ).
What do you think – whether this prototype is based on hybrid technology? Crossbreed between induction balance and PI ( pulse induction ) . Or not ?
Because many things in this world are correlated , predictable , I expect a small number of members of this forum to say their point of view . We are unlikely to hear the opinion of professionals - they are quite cautious… As seen on the video , discrimination is insecure for targets less than 2 euros , behind the stone targets it is impossible to recognize whether they are made of iron or not ( I was correct , I also show the detector's reaction against iron targets ) . Even with the most advanced pulse technology only the time constant of the target can be determined , but not whether this target is iron , or is of non-magnetic metal .
Thank you very much for your attention . Thanks in advance for any opinions .

[WM6]

In air tests all magic hocus-pokus are possible.

[kt315]

What do you think – whether this prototype is based on hybrid technology?
---
must see the schematic before to answer you.

[dbanner]

Is there any reference to a schematic. From the video, it looks to be a standard VLF/IB metal detector operating at higher frequency. Where is description of the metal detector design.

[eclipse]

Just one more promotional video aiming showing alien technologies in a 50$ enclosures?
When it comes to cheapo youtube demo videos they all look suspicious to me.

[kt315]

i reminder Riss again, for you. GEOTECH1 is not indexed in Google. there is no chance to promote anything via this site.
all your efforts are in vain. we must see schematic, principles, code, HEX, part list, signals in control points.
only then we will be able to say you something.

[Riss]

Is there any reference to a schematic. From the video, it looks to be a standard VLF/IB metal detector operating at higher frequency. Where is description of the metal detector design.

I have a lot of stones like this, but smaller ones . I've tested all top-model detectors of the six largest metal detectors manufacturers , brands that have long been proven in the market . Detektors , operating in the range of 6 to 82 KHZ . Most of them are being advertised as professional , to search for golden nuggets . All of them have huge problems with the stone from this video - overload sometimes starts at about 16-20 cm from search head , but some models are worse .
- I have another stone , which I use for a reference . it is about 3 times smaller than that of this video . The neodymium magnet also sticks to it, but with much less force . The reactive component produced by it is at least 30 times weaker - I measure it with an oscilloscope . When I push ( move ) my reference stone initially in the transmission coil , then into the receiving coil , I listen to detector reactions in all metal mode . Before this test the detector is tuned for maximum reject ( exclusion )of the stone . Even this stone can not be completely rejected … we are seeing a much stronger response in transmitter coil , than in the receiving coil . In the video prototype test such a difference in responses absent .
Something else -you can answer yourself what is happening with discrimination in the test of world brands with stones significantly weaker than the one from the video . He is a real monster !
description, circuits of this detector prototype are in a folder with inscription ( labeled ) - ,,Top Secret !!! Burn before you read ! “

[Riss]

i reminder Riss again, for you. GEOTECH1 is not indexed in Google. there is no chance to promote anything via this site.
all your efforts are in vain. we must see schematic, principles, code, HEX, part list, signals in control points.
only then we will be able to say you something.

Where you see advertising ?!? Advertising prototype which is not intended for sale is pointless , nonsense . If you have not understood it yet , I'll tell you that – this topic shows tests that greatly help mental activity . For example me, after doing such tests I have solved quite technical problems .
When you skillfully use stones ( but not to strike them in your head ) , targets with short and long time constants , and you know how to use them , you can understand a lot of work on the principle of action and many other important details … There is no need to open the detector , to scream it , to see his circuit . Please look at my topic on detector in this great forum . No one could add anything more about the tests .
Another - , it is true that Christmas is approaching , but I'm not a Santa Claus , or Ded (grandfather ) Moroz , nor are you a obedient child to give you Christmas presents…
Knowledge is not given freely, it is not a gift . Please read Chinese philosophy, Indian wisdom , meditate . You have heard somewhere ( to hear somewhere ? ) alien , which has come down of his flying saucer or a saucepan and to give books or flash drives , or to speak lectures of the inhabitants of the earth ???

[kt315]

you put your video in TECHNOLOGY forum. where is the tech in your link? where FULL STORY WITH SCHEMATIC? i see just bare TROLLIZM from your side.

santa claus bl.

[Qiaozhi]

This is not a hybrid detector. It's a VLF.
In fact, it's a Golden Mask, as you can see in the last few seconds of the video.

[kt315]

real universal detector. REAL HYBRID. http://www.metdet.ru/universal.htm

[dbanner]

Yea. Just a VLf. However the tx oscillator consisting of MOSFET transistors?(golden mask) maybe that's supposed to be hybrid type of oscillator? Ha.

[dbanner]

real universal detector. REAL HYBRID. http://www.metdet.ru/universal.htm

Now I suppose you would have to use a different search head for PI mode?

[kt315]

its clear yes. Eric told pi DD coil is not balanced while vlf is balanced. here is some inconsistency you see.
everyone who say us 'hybrid pi-vlf simultaneously' is unhonest.

[dbanner]

Hybrid technology VLf/Pi gold detector.