Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Single capacitor integrator switch placement

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Altra View Post
    Thanks Green

    I was thinking in the 1C, the integrator capacitor is seeing 2X the samples as each capacitor in a differential circuit. Therefore a difference in integration time constants?
    Think I'm correct, not positive.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by green View Post
      Do you use integrators with new designs or sample with an A-D and digital filter?
      I have been working on a PIC32MX design that does the Integrator in code.
      Simply sampling and filtering did not have the sensitivity to small target changes.

      Comment


      • #18
        My favourite sample and hold analog integrators Click image for larger version

Name:	Scan_20180413.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	245.7 KB
ID:	357515

        Eric.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by green View Post
          Tried both ways. Switch after input resistors better for me, not sure why.

          Thats very clever Green, how did you test the EFE ?, thanks.

          Comment


          • #20
            Hi I am currently in the progress of putting together a PI detector schematic based on all the info I have learned from this forum
            Just curious, is it a gold or coin machine ?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by 6666 View Post
              Thats very clever Green, how did you test the EFE ?, thanks.
              Held a fridge magnet near coil and pulled it away quickly. Watched scope trace, connected to integrator out.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by green View Post
                Held a fridge magnet near coil and pulled it away quickly. Watched scope trace, connected to integrator out.

                Thanks I tried it a couple of times by waving the fridge magnet across the coil from one side to the other, as thats how the coil moves in space but was not sure it worked properly, I will try your method.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by 6666 View Post
                  Thanks I tried it a couple of times by waving the fridge magnet across the coil from one side to the other, as thats how the coil moves in space but was not sure it worked properly, I will try your method.
                  It's been awhile since I did it. First time I used a ceramic magnet, saw a reply where you suggested using a fridge magnet. Fridge magnet worked also. Some magnets don't work because they cause a target signal when not moving.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by bklein View Post
                    I think it was one of those EDN design notes, possibly in one of their collection books. Is there a site that may have all these old design notes books online?
                    EDN has the Design Ideas archived back to 1969.

                    Originally posted by green View Post
                    It's been awhile since I did it. First time I used a ceramic magnet, saw a reply where you suggested using a fridge magnet. Fridge magnet worked also. Some magnets don't work because they cause a target signal when not moving.
                    If you're talking about a flexible strip fridge magnet, those are Halbach magnets which have a low flux density except near the surface. Ideally, one surface has an alternating +-+-+- field and the other side has no magnetic field at all. I would avoid this for testing EFE. Find a good ceramic magnet that doesn't create any kind of target signal.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Ferric Toes View Post
                      My favourite sample and hold analog integrators [ATTACH]50454[/ATTACH]

                      Eric.
                      I've always been intrigued by that circuit but have still never tried it. A cool way to have a variable TC.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Carl-NC View Post
                        I've always been intrigued by that circuit but have still never tried it. A cool way to have a variable TC.
                        Just trying to learn something. Why would I want a variable TC?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          In general, slower integration can add depth but requires a slower sweep speed, and makes target responses a bit mushier. Fast integration gives a snappy response but with a little less depth.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            https://www.geotech1.com/forums/atta...4&d=1591477213

                            I've spent a lot of time trying to understand the track hold differential integrator without much success. Good because it keeps the brain active, one of my reasons for being on the forum.

                            Think I understand a 1C integrator(output=Rfdbk/Rin*sample time*sample rate*average sample V) TC=(Rfdbk*Cfdbk). Sample rate and sample time effect output signal.

                            Using spice with constant 1V input with track hold differential integrator, output=1*6800/2200*((Rfdbk/(Rfdbk+10k))second stage. Doesn't appear sample time or rate effect gain with constant input. Wondering how sample time effects signal out when sampling a quarter? Don't know how to calculate TC.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              If you're talking about a flexible strip fridge magnet, those are Halbach magnets which have a low flux density except near the surface. Ideally, one surface has an alternating +-+-+- field and the other side has no magnetic field at all. I would avoid this for testing EFE. Find a good ceramic magnet that doesn't create any kind of target signal.

                              Round ceramic magnets can have +- on the same side also. Need to be more selective than I was thinking.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by green View Post
                                https://www.geotech1.com/forums/atta...4&d=1591477213

                                I've spent a lot of time trying to understand the track hold differential integrator without much success. Good because it keeps the brain active, one of my reasons for being on the forum.

                                Think I understand a 1C integrator(output=Rfdbk/Rin*sample time*sample rate*average sample V) TC=(Rfdbk*Cfdbk). Sample rate and sample time effect output signal.

                                Using spice with constant 1V input with track hold differential integrator, output=1*6800/2200*((Rfdbk/(Rfdbk+10k))second stage. Doesn't appear sample time or rate effect gain with constant input. Wondering how sample time effects signal out when sampling a quarter? Don't know how to calculate TC.
                                Green here are some threads I dug up. We all have read these before, but may spark some new understandings

                                See post #4

                                https://www.geotech1.com/forums/show...ntegrator+gain

                                Calculating integrator gain

                                https://www.geotech1.com/forums/show...ntegrator+gain

                                Simulation

                                https://www.geotech1.com/forums/show...ntegrator+gain

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X