Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Retorical questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Retorical questions


    Folks,
    can any body explain to me and others concerned, some things:
    1)difference and efficacy between 2 things:case when U have a
    sinusoidal shape of output signal in TX circuit,and when U
    have quadrature shape of signal in TX circuit
    I noticed,most of earlier detectors have sinus output.But later
    projects do have quadrat.Some Fishers lately use second case.
    In my experiments I noticed that in some cases quadrat provides
    much stronger received signal,impassive in higher percent to
    external clutters....or it is just my imagination.
    2)how to convert sinus to quadrat and vice-versa on simpliest
    level(i do have some complicated solutions)
    3)Almost all IB designs done on principle simply to TX a signal
    to TX coil and then to analyze RX signal.The most attention
    is payed to received signal and it's processing through band-
    pass filters,ampllifiers,shifters and lately DSP.During that
    process U have a lack of some elements of RX signal.U can
    compensate those lacks somehow, but at the end in most of the
    cases U gain the simillar results.Now...how about idea to pay
    most of attention on composition of a TX signal.How about to
    generate very complicated and rich TX signal...let's say poliharmonic
    (near-by freq.'s),put some delay,some decay(not as in PI) and
    even to combine and make some array of sinus and quadrat signals
    upon some time base.And than later to simply analyze received
    signal without many lacking points.Simply just to receive and
    a bit shaped RX.What I want to say to reverse the point of
    conventional thinking.To try to prospect something more with
    TX signal mostly. I noticed that most of IB's have very simple
    TX, U may say obsolete, and everybody trying to improve only
    RX circuitry....think about that!
    4) The amplitude of TX signal is not need to be high.Many people
    try to amplify it more and more.Besides what FCC said I think
    it is not necessairly.Low freq. goes deep any way.But magnetic
    field has limits.How to generate a very closely magnetic field
    without a very strong signal?
    And I do have many more questions, but I am not gonna bug U any
    more.Those questions are enough.If I get answers on those, esspecially
    on the third one I would be very satisfied.I am trying to start a
    open-mind conversation, 'cose I noticed that on this forum are very
    educated and good spirit people, which is rare this days on the
    other forums. Congratulation to promoter(s) !!!
Working...
X