Tweet
Ok Paul go for it
Paul let us for the moment accept that you are an EM genius and that Eric, Reg and Dave are totally wrong in their design philosophy and implementation of their Pi platforms.
Let me put you to the test with the following hypothetical scenario. I want you to design me a Pi detector for gold prospecting. The criteria you must meet are as follows:
1. 20-100% more depth than a mine lab machine on nuggets from 1gram- hundreds of ounces over all types of ground.
2. The detector must not give any false signals due to ground minerals, it must only respond to metallic targets.
3. The detector must be highly immune to any forms of EM interference man made or environmental
4. The detector must be capable of discriminating with 100% accuracy at full Pi depth ferrous/non ferrous or preferably respond only to gold.
5. The platform must be one man portable, user friendly and safe.
6. It must comply with current EM emission standards.
7. You can use either digital or analogue circuits or a combination of both for the platform and any signal processing algorithms or methods you deem appropriate.
8. It must be capable of using a wide range of coil types from small to very large preferably of a monoloop or similar type. The coils should be capable of being used by one person.
9. The rechargeable power pack should give at least six hours detecting and not be excessively heavy or bulky.
10. Cost of the platform is not a consideration if the above objectives are realized.
11. If a Pi platform will not achieve the above objectives then you are free to design, develop and implement any other technology that will satisfy the above.
Ok Paul here is a chance to make a name for yourself, go for it! Let us see if you really have anything useful to contribute on the technical and electronic side that we can subject to critical analysis or are you just a big bag of wind?
ElectroNovice
Paul let us for the moment accept that you are an EM genius and that Eric, Reg and Dave are totally wrong in their design philosophy and implementation of their Pi platforms.
Let me put you to the test with the following hypothetical scenario. I want you to design me a Pi detector for gold prospecting. The criteria you must meet are as follows:
1. 20-100% more depth than a mine lab machine on nuggets from 1gram- hundreds of ounces over all types of ground.
2. The detector must not give any false signals due to ground minerals, it must only respond to metallic targets.
3. The detector must be highly immune to any forms of EM interference man made or environmental
4. The detector must be capable of discriminating with 100% accuracy at full Pi depth ferrous/non ferrous or preferably respond only to gold.
5. The platform must be one man portable, user friendly and safe.
6. It must comply with current EM emission standards.
7. You can use either digital or analogue circuits or a combination of both for the platform and any signal processing algorithms or methods you deem appropriate.
8. It must be capable of using a wide range of coil types from small to very large preferably of a monoloop or similar type. The coils should be capable of being used by one person.
9. The rechargeable power pack should give at least six hours detecting and not be excessively heavy or bulky.
10. Cost of the platform is not a consideration if the above objectives are realized.
11. If a Pi platform will not achieve the above objectives then you are free to design, develop and implement any other technology that will satisfy the above.
Ok Paul here is a chance to make a name for yourself, go for it! Let us see if you really have anything useful to contribute on the technical and electronic side that we can subject to critical analysis or are you just a big bag of wind?
ElectroNovice
Comment