If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Yes – this is the detector. For at least 10 years http://mikronbg.com/ has been dealing mainly with sales on https://www.akadetectors.com/product...st-of-all-aka- products&fbclid=IwAR3t1Py7_cO6CoMJkP1Cs-we0V7IesFX4iKeAFa7W3x5fV9g0GxHXmrKoHg. The basic architecture of this hybrid is from a colleague from the city of Ruse - so was said by a participant in the forum. The depth is not what impresses me, but the discrimination... If I test it - I will write here. There will also be a video.Congratulations SGS - you are Sherlock Holmes At https://metaldetecting.eu/ I asked a lot of questions, but as I expected - few answers. 10 units have been field tested for about 4 months, and it has been on sale for about 2 months. but any information is extremely limited and selected
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsWqbYt37ng The 6 cm deep plastic tray is filled with pure magnetite sand. about 10% of it is very fine dust - like ash. in the "discrimination" mode, you would often miss this coin at a depth of 6 cm, since the signal is shorter than that in the "all metals" mode, and notices a delay (compared to all metal mode) . the coin is 1 lev BGN. the depth of stable registration in the magnetite sand is no more than 4-5 cm ( In discrimination mode ) .
It will be very interesting to compare the iron discriminating possibilities of this detector with the detector described in "PI Technology/New Project - MPS PI - Iron discriminating metal detector"
As I heard from people from Bulgaria this Vortex is a vlf device?! And since Professor Vojinov is testing it, I am convinced that it is vlf, because as I heard, in is not understood in pi..
As I heard from people from Bulgaria this Vortex is a vlf device?! And since Professor Vojinov is testing it, I am convinced that it is vlf, because as I heard, in is not understood in pi..
Orbit , I can't understand how they talk like that... there are only two clips on youtube and no comparative tests and videos with serially produced models. no one told me anything about Vortex project. I don't have the title of "professor". anyway, my goal was a high efficiency coin-mining detector tailored to statistics from Roman settlements. what I'm demonstrating is a rather "truncate " version, as my options for saturating boards with elements, and assembly work are deplorable ...I will ask you to rewrite the sentence ,, am convinced that it is vlf, because as I heard, in is not understood in pi ‘‘.you can write it in two separate sentences - so google translator will translate it more correctly.
Comment