Basic stamp
This last weekend I hooked up the basic stamp to a breadboard of the clock circuit from the Hammerhead with Q1 Q2 with associated components and Q3 with coil diodes and 1k resistor. I used the BS to pulse the circuit and try out different coil and cable combinations.
Minimum pulse width was 2 usec and I adjusted it up to about 200usecs.
Just wanted to get a look at the readings on each component.
Well I found that my circuit Produced a delay of about 17 usec no matter what coil or cable combo I used. I figured there was no way all of them produced the same delays. So I started looking at the signals starting at the input to Q1 and on til I got to the gate of Q3.
I found that at the base of Q2 I had a problem in the fall time of the circuit.
From pulse turn off till 0 volts or -Vbb it took about 10 usecs to reach 0.
Way to slow to trigger the gate of Q3 into cutoff which is about 4 volts.
After changing the value of the resistors I was able to get virtualy no delay from the pulse turn off from the bs to the gate of Q3 which gave me a 7 usec delay rather than the 17 usec delay I had when I started.
So you see the BS is a useful tool in learning how to optimize the circuit using a breadboard for different subsections. programming is precise, if you want to change the pulse width or Freq it is just a matter of changing a couple of numbers and clicking run and you have it. This way the settings are always the same. Now I have to go back to the Hammerhead board and find out where I may have a wrong component value or possibly a bad one.
More to come
RayNM
This last weekend I hooked up the basic stamp to a breadboard of the clock circuit from the Hammerhead with Q1 Q2 with associated components and Q3 with coil diodes and 1k resistor. I used the BS to pulse the circuit and try out different coil and cable combinations.
Minimum pulse width was 2 usec and I adjusted it up to about 200usecs.
Just wanted to get a look at the readings on each component.
Well I found that my circuit Produced a delay of about 17 usec no matter what coil or cable combo I used. I figured there was no way all of them produced the same delays. So I started looking at the signals starting at the input to Q1 and on til I got to the gate of Q3.
I found that at the base of Q2 I had a problem in the fall time of the circuit.
From pulse turn off till 0 volts or -Vbb it took about 10 usecs to reach 0.
Way to slow to trigger the gate of Q3 into cutoff which is about 4 volts.
After changing the value of the resistors I was able to get virtualy no delay from the pulse turn off from the bs to the gate of Q3 which gave me a 7 usec delay rather than the 17 usec delay I had when I started.
So you see the BS is a useful tool in learning how to optimize the circuit using a breadboard for different subsections. programming is precise, if you want to change the pulse width or Freq it is just a matter of changing a couple of numbers and clicking run and you have it. This way the settings are always the same. Now I have to go back to the Hammerhead board and find out where I may have a wrong component value or possibly a bad one.
More to come
RayNM

Comment