Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fantastic P.I front end building block

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by sharky View Post
    The Wizards design is common similar circuit from elecktor old edition 1997 or older in parallel using LT1028 too. Or use low noise opamps cooled by liwuid nitrogen or helium....
    You can do the same with e.g. OP27 and similar to gain same noise level... and you don't need any liquid nitrogen to get it work.

    (also cause mil range is from -55 °C and not less than this... and if you use liquid nitrogen you'll be lost in space... at atmospheric pressure, it boils at −196 °C... lot of troubles... and stuff cracks due to thermal gradient from inner and outer of them)

    Comment


    • #17
      This is not my design...
      This is example from PMI 1986 catalog...

      Precision Monolithics Inc - now Analog Device

      Comment


      • #18
        Doc was too big ..bugger.

        Comment


        • #19
          I have uploaded front end designs to a site I have, PDF is 2.67 Megs so it may take a while to load.

          The front end design is near identical to what Candy did for SD2000 and 2100 so I think he got it out of the book.

          http://app4.websitetonight.com/proje.../low_noise.pdf

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by TheWizard View Post
            This is not my design...
            This is example from PMI 1986 catalog...

            Precision Monolithics Inc - now Analog Device
            I think using low noise transistors can achieve a better result, why use opamps

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Max View Post
              You can do the same with e.g. OP27 and similar to gain same noise level... and you don't need any liquid nitrogen to get it work.

              (also cause mil range is from -55 °C and not less than this... and if you use liquid nitrogen you'll be lost in space... at atmospheric pressure, it boils at −196 °C... lot of troubles... and stuff cracks due to thermal gradient from inner and outer of them)
              Our deep sapce probes run at -196 °C, use an aero grade one

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Elie View Post
                Why do you always use such short lines when you type?
                Elie seems to be te only lady in this projects...wonder where other girls are, this seems to be a man project

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by sharky View Post
                  Elie seems to be te only lady in this projects...wonder where other girls are, this seems to be a man project
                  I am a man.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Elie View Post
                    I am a man.
                    ROTFLMAO

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      OP 27

                      Originally posted by Max View Post
                      You can do the same with e.g. OP27 and similar to gain same noise level... and you don't need any liquid nitrogen to get it work.

                      (also cause mil range is from -55 °C and not less than this... and if you use liquid nitrogen you'll be lost in space... at atmospheric pressure, it boils at −196 °C... lot of troubles... and stuff cracks due to thermal gradient from inner and outer of them)

                      Hi Max,

                      The op27 is an old story, I have about 10 here from years

                      ago. It is low noise, problem is it doesn't recover fast

                      enough from saturation.

                      Of course all this sillyness about noise assumes there is

                      not a larger external or internal noise source {micro/digital}

                      booming away alot bigger than nice gaussian noise, which

                      integrates nicey so it effects are reduced.

                      op37, same thing got some of them too.

                      The old Comlinear op amp CLC502 was a nice fast part I did

                      use. think they quit making em.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Mr. Bean View Post
                        Hi Max,

                        The op27 is an old story, I have about 10 here from years

                        ago. It is low noise, problem is it doesn't recover fast

                        enough from saturation.

                        Of course all this sillyness about noise assumes there is

                        not a larger external or internal noise source {micro/digital}

                        booming away alot bigger than nice gaussian noise, which

                        integrates nicey so it effects are reduced.

                        op37, same thing got some of them too.

                        The old Comlinear op amp CLC502 was a nice fast part I did

                        use. think they quit making em.
                        Hi,
                        yes you are right... are a bit old now. I found them useful when played with PI front-ends some years ago, but of course are not recent stuff now and maybe also near out of production.

                        I think they still produce some of them cause there is a market for these ics still now ... cause many academic/scientific applications actually rely on that old op amps and related designs.

                        My point was on the parallel config that I saw many times on old datasheets of that devices to gain ultra low noise, but sure there are a lot more speedy op amps today that do the same with just one instead of many parallel op amps.

                        Best regards,
                        Max

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I meant old subject

                          Hi Max,

                          Old discussion, you will reconize some of the participants.

                          Oh and btw Dave Johnson doesn't know the difference

                          between an uncompensated amplifier and a

                          current feedback amplifier {cfa}

                          don't let him confuse you. Here's the read.

                          http://www.findmall.com/read.php?34,...389#msg-130389

                          http://www.findmall.com/read.php?34,130384,page=2

                          http://www.findmall.com/read.php?34,130384,page=3

                          http://www.findmall.com/read.php?34,132229,page=1

                          http://www.findmall.com/read.php?34,...256#msg-132256

                          http://www.findmall.com/read.php?34,132229,page=3

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Oh btw

                            Oh and the data sheets on the

                            OP27 and OP37 are just fine.

                            Don't let the spook monster

                            scare you.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              lsk389

                              Here is another preamp article using the lsk389 fets

                              turns out some of them can have higher noise

                              as per specification. They cost $7.19 a piece.

                              So may want to measure them or screen them

                              before selecting the best.

                              http://www.audioxpress.com/magsdirx/.../colin2774.pdf

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                or

                                Or use something else.

                                better.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X