Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fantastic P.I front end building block

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    So

    So going to have to really really understand

    exactly the source and effects of noise in a

    correlated double sampled system, and how

    frequencies can be moved in frequency.

    And all the math.

    Before anyone DSPs it away.

    Comment


    • #32
      FET

      "And when you are designing your front end Fet electronics save yourselfs
      some trouble and a simple grounded source fet with a drain/gain resistor
      based on gfs of about a gain of 20 to 30 then AC couple to the op amp more
      voltage gain. The voltage gain of 20 to 30 will make all the noise spec fall
      onto the fet and virtually none on the op amp. 1/A^2 of the first stage. No
      feedback to the fet. or you can feedback if you wish no biggy as long as you
      don't have any trouble with the oscillations."


      Hey JC1; it seems that you are more familliar with FET's than me.Good! Can you take a look
      on Tesoro Golden Sabre Light schematic in "TEsoro Golden Sabre" thread.
      There are 2 switching fets designated as J107 (BF245....simillar). Those 2 are producing
      lot of noise due switching role they are playing in design. Ocassionaly device is
      "tic..tic"-ing, producing short decayed false signals, which is in a way disturbing for
      user. I have found way to eliminate this by lowering Sensitivity at 50%...but dont feel
      satisfied with that. Was thinking to find a way how to eliminate that fet noise....
      Trully dont have a clue yet. Can you take a good look on it and suggest some solution?
      Actually i am not quite sure what provocking device to act like that. Coil is not,front end
      is not.....Either fets, or something in last stages after fets???
      But it would be good and beneficial for me (and other TGSL makers) to eliminate fets noise
      and be sure that those are not source of problem any more...
      If you can...please do and post your opinion there...

      Best regards!


      Comment


      • #33
        Use Transistors

        Originally posted by Mr. Bean View Post
        Hi Max,

        The op27 is an old story, I have about 10 here from years
        use. think they quit making em.
        Why are u using costlynoisy opamps use a low noise transistors in parallel, about 8 or 3 to 4 they reduce noise levels by cancelling the random noise..

        Comment


        • #34
          Fet

          HI Ivconic,

          Hmmm,,,, could be several things, but along the line of the

          fet it is used in your oscillator as an

          Amplitude Stabilisation Circuit

          Now if your xmit oscillator is varying in amplitude it

          shouldn't matter too much if you coil is very well null.

          Which is hard to do, anyway you could try varying some of

          the resistors some and see if your tic tic changes or not.

          http://sound.westhost.com/project22.htm



          FET - A Field Effect Transistor works quite well as a voltage controlled resistor, but has a limited peak voltage, so the level must be kept below 1V if distortion is to remain within respectable limits. This is barely acceptable for the output of this oscillator. A FET circuit was considered and discarded.

          Comment


          • #35
            Square root

            Originally posted by sharky View Post
            Why are u using costlynoisy opamps use a low noise transistors in parallel, about 8 or 3 to 4 they reduce noise levels by cancelling the random noise..
            If I remember right this random noise is reduced by the

            square root of the number of devices. i.e. 4 op amps

            half the noise of one. So if you want factor of 4 improvement

            you need 16 devices. Like to go from 4nv/rtHz to 1nv/rtHz.

            Hey Sharky, there are bigger "noise" problems then

            4nv/rtHz of a NE5534. Solve those, and then this stuff

            becomes important.

            Comment


            • #36
              http://www.national.com/pf/LM/LMH6624.html

              Comment


              • #37
                Nice

                Originally posted by TheWizard View Post
                Nice find Wizard. Have you used this part? does it recover

                fast enough? Looks fast Good CLC502 replacement !!!

                And traditional voltage feedback as they say on the

                datasheet

                This is definitely a good canidate. And price doesn't look too

                bad either. Nice find.

                AN-1604: Application Note 1604 Decompensated Operational Amplifiers
                OA-12: OA-12 Noise Analysis for Comlinear Amplifiers
                OA-14: OA-14 Improving Amplifier Noise for High 3rd Inte
                OA-18: OA-18 Simulation SPICE Models for Comlinear's Op
                OA-21: OA-21 Component Pre-distortion for Sallen Key
                OA-26: OA-26 Designing Active High Speed Filters
                OA-27: OA-27 Low-Sensitivity, Lowpass Filter Design
                OA-28: OA-28 Low-Sensitivity, Bandpass Filter Design with Tuning Method
                OA-29: OA-29 Low-Sensitivity, Highpass Filter Design with
                OA-30: OA-30 Current vs. Voltage Feedback Amplifiers

                {the application notes at the bottom look interesting}

                {worth a read and free too}

                Hey Wizard you sure this isn't the CLC502 replacement?

                Comment


                • #38
                  25 uAmps

                  Hi Wizard,

                  Input is kinda leaky, 25 uAmps.

                  That's alot of input current.

                  better keep resistors low.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    AD

                    Hi Wizard,

                    The AD797 looks better.

                    Everybody is talking about it. Be careful comparing the noise

                    plots the 797 is close to 1 nV/rtHz at even 100 Hz.

                    The national part is there at about 10 kHz.

                    For PI applictions the 797 is quiter.

                    and has alot less input current 250 nA instead of 25000 nA.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Hi
                      Reality, thermal noise and OP noise is not problem.
                      The BIG problem is broadcast and 50..120Hz noise.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by TheWizard View Post
                        Now every body speaks of noise...I told to use LM66XX previously.....but dropped off due to cost

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by JC1 View Post
                          Like to go from 4nv/rtHz to 1nv/rtHz.

                          Hey Sharky, there are bigger "noise" problems then

                          4nv/rtHz of a NE5534. Solve those, and then this stuff

                          becomes important.
                          High JC1

                          DID U mean big noise problems as 50hz and transmitter towers??? try a balanced detector similar to TwinLoop Treasure seeker...

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Thanks JC1 !!!

                            You gave me another approach to this problem! Might be not those switching fets but the one in oscillator part! How come i didnt realised that!?
                            I never tested TX amplit. and its behavior!
                            I'll perform some tests now!

                            Thank you!
                            Best regards!

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              xmitter Fet

                              Hi Ivconic,

                              The fet in xmit is supposed to stabilized the amplitude.

                              even if it is wandering around it may not show up on

                              voltmeter. may have to use scope to see it. otherwise

                              take a good look around the fet at the voltages if it makes

                              sense. you may need too read the specs on the one you

                              are using and sometime even "select" a fet or adjust

                              the resistors around the one you have to get it to work.

                              or it won't really work, in which case you will need another

                              or thermistor if you can find that. Search internet for

                              oscillators wein bridge, clapp, colpitts, and some will have

                              fet feedback stabilization. Also try touching points of osc.

                              and see if it beeps at you. or replace the oscillator with

                              some other type you have parts to build.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                ...

                                Originally posted by sharky View Post
                                High JC1

                                DID U mean big noise problems as 50hz and transmitter towers??? try a balanced detector similar to TwinLoop Treasure seeker...
                                High Sharky,

                                Yes to both of those, but also that the double correlated

                                sampling moves these external noise sources around in

                                frequency. particularly the movement into lower frequecies

                                like HZ and subHz.

                                Maxim.

                                Undersampling is a powerful tool that can be used effectively in selectedapplications. It allows an ADC to behave like a mixer in that it can takea modulated high-frequency carrier signal and create an image that islower in frequency . In this way it behaves like a downconverter.

                                One drawback of undersampling is that unwanted signals can appear in the desired band of interest and you cannot differentiate them from the desired signal.

                                http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/an_pk/928

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X