Gap tx signal in the presence of a metal

[Unregistered]

Alquien could tell as desfasa signal of the coil with respect Rx Tx function in the metal that is present in degrees
There was an article on a website and I can not find need help

[Unregistered]

Oh, yeah

Alquien could tell as desfasa signal of the coil with respect Rx Tx function in the metal that is present in degrees
There was an article on a website and I can not find need help

When you do not use some punctuation unintelligible communication becomes even more unintelligible than it would otherwise
What language are desfasa and alquien do they use periods or commas

[Unregistered]

desfase entre la señal transmitida bobina tx y señal recibida Rx

Me gustaria saber en que angulos se desfasa la señal transmitida en la bobina Tx y la recibida en la bobina Rx en presencia de un metal

Hierro
Cobre
Bronce
chapas
plata
oro

MI IDIOMA ES ESPAÑOL Y LOS TRADUCTORES SON MUY MALOS

[Unregistered]

EXPLAINS US PATENT 4.486.713

IN PATENT 4,486,713 FIGURE 1 EXPLAINS SOME THE ISSUE COULD SOMEONE SEND ME INFORMATION ABOUT IT, MORE HELP HELP ME

[Fred]

Me gustaria saber en que angulos se desfasa la señal transmitida en la bobina Tx y la recibida en la bobina Rx en presencia de un metal

Hierro
Cobre
Bronce
chapas
plata
oro

MI IDIOMA ES ESPAÑOL Y LOS TRADUCTORES SON MUY MALOS

Hola,
Un amigo me dicho esto:
"Ferrous gives a decrease in magnitude, non-ferrous gives an increase, and all targets will cause a phase-shift to the left."
Esto es:Hierrosos reducen la amplitud , no-hierrosos hacen aumentar,e todos los matales producem um desplacamiento de fase para la isquierda.
Saludos , Fred.

[Unregistered]

more explication

Where can I find a site that an explanation of this, both in signal amplitude variation in the angle outdated thanks

[porkluvr]

IN PATENT 4,486,713 FIGURE 1 EXPLAINS SOME THE ISSUE COULD SOMEONE SEND ME INFORMATION ABOUT IT, MORE HELP HELP ME

What's the matter, can't you understand plain English? That's meant to be taken as a joke. English is my first (and only) language and I can't understand this patent either.

I think Gifford's drawings are hard to understand because he has essentially drawn them backwards from convention. His time-vs-amplitude drawings would be oscillographs except that they are drawn mirror-image. The same goes for the phasor drawings, he draws counter clockwise angles for what are lagging, negative angles - which by algebraic convention should start at 3:00 and go clockwise.

Even knowing this, I still haven't digested his discourse and I am no expert, but I don't think that by departing from convention makes the subject any easier to understand.

I am in the process of inverting the images and will maybe post them here, but first, I want to make sure that I am on the right track and that it will help dispel confusion instead of adding to it.

Sometimes when I look at these patents I have to reassess my sanity, it's almost like they want to create an alternate reality. You're a trip, JG.