Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SD2000 Front end

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    links

    Here are some links on IntraFet low noise devices.

    notice the different noise, capacitance and die sizes.

    now to get lower noise than the lowest one here you

    would need to start paralleling them.

    http://www.interfet.com/pdf/P_NJ450L.pdf

    http://www.interfet.com/pdf/P_NJ903L.pdf

    Comment


    • #17
      3

      this one looks like 3 in parallel,

      in one package, very low noise,

      very high capacitance, very large die.

      http://www.interfet.com/pdf/P_NJ3600L.pdf

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by JC1 View Post
        this one looks like 3 in parallel,

        in one package, very low noise,

        very high capacitance, very large die.

        http://www.interfet.com/pdf/P_NJ3600L.pdf
        Thanks JC1,



        so we can reduce the input resistors + pre-amp resistors to lower the resistor noises.

        I will start soon making some noise analysis on:
        - different power supplies
        - pre-amps
        - coils and coil shieldings

        I will also take milliWatt®™ PI coil pulses into account to reduce inherent noise and mineral soil magnetization.

        Aziz

        Comment


        • #19
          hi

          hi at all
          see this video peraps is intresting for you

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCKThqg7h5E

          best reguards

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by gef12 View Post
            hi
            I dont suppose there is a sd2000 pcb in the making ...
            Good try at the sd2000 on breadboard ..now i know I shouldnt try it as yet..
            Have you try shielding the front end stage ?? or anything else ??
            Anyways thanks
            Hi,
            No, I didn't shield anything. In fact when I saw it works in motion mode, didn't try anymore on it... I like non-motion MDs...

            Best regards,
            1843

            Comment


            • #21
              Ye roger that .. I would have more benefit with motion mode as it gives me a good idea of where small targets lie .. especially nuggets... just cant visuallize how a non-motion would work or in what scenario ... have only used motion md's
              thanks anyways

              Comment


              • #22
                1843 did you use the same components as those on the schematic
                some of them like LT1057 have very good parameters and if you use
                alternative the circuit could suffer from noises from such components
                I also want to build the it, but I am novice, don't know if i could do it.
                I am making board for it, 3 days just the power supply part ready

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by eclipse View Post
                  1843 did you use the same components as those on the schematic
                  some of them like LT1057 have very good parameters and if you use
                  alternative the circuit could suffer from noises from such components
                  I also want to build the it, but I am novice, don't know if i could do it.
                  I am making board for it, 3 days just the power supply part ready
                  No! As I said the mine had many difference.... I used an LT1054 for power supply,
                  LF356 instead of LT1057... etc.

                  Best regards,
                  1843

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    At least we know the schematic is correct, which is good ...

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      sd2000

                      hello Would explore how useful this is the metal detector?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X