Tweet
In a recent email to us AIAS members and participants of an internal list discussion, Dr. Myron Evans talked about the sucessful true explanation of the B(3) field's decisive role in the electromagnetic radiation according to the ECE theory, which the standard scientific model just don't explain. It relates to the true assumption of the photon mass.
All my LRL researches always pointed to that direction, specially now with my upcoming working system. I can't stress enough how rewarding a serious and deep study can be and how happy and proud I am.
It's extremely exciting getting out of the dark and going into the light to understand simply why and how MFDs work for instance.
Here's a portion of Dr. Evans' message, some editings done by me:
The B(3) field is the magnetic flux density of electromagnetic radiation observed in the magnetization of matter by electromagnetic radiation. It occurs only in a generally covariant unified field theory. It was inferred at Cornell in 1991 and published in Physica B in 1992. A notorious incident occurred in late 1992 when the PhysicaL Review E accepted a paper on B(3) and then "unaccepted" it. This incident was due to the fact that in the standard physics electromagnetic radiation in vacuo is supposed to be made up of plane waves, due to the standard assumption that the photon mass is zero. In ECE theory the photon mass is non-zero, and the B(3) field is generated by the spin connection of spacetime itself. The ECE description has been acccepted since then as being the required description of electromagnetic radiation, i.e. a generally covariant description unified with the description of gravitation. The attacks on the B(3) field in the early nineties were unscientific, as history has shown. They were orchestrated by the standard physics faction. First came an amateurish attempt by the physical chemist L. D. Barron using incorrect symmetry arguments based on nineteenth century concepts. ...
...Then came a subjective attack by the notorious A. Lakhtakia, known to be "Science Guy" on Wikipedia and known to be a cybserstalker and e mail abuser, an ally of the cyberstalker G. Bruhn recently warned by a barrister. Lakhtakia seemed to take a strong personal dislike to B(3), and his "paper", submitted to "Foundations of Physics Letters", described the field as "ghastly". Evidently the guy had no shaving mirror...
...I cannot take any of this stuff seriously now, a decade later. The Omnia Opera section from 1992 onwards gives a multitude of arguments in favour of B(3), first using an extended gauge theory of electromagnetism, and then ECE theory with finite photon mass. In great contrast to the cybsertsalkers of history, the eminent elder statesmen of relativity, Vigier and Wheeler, accepted the B(3) field as if it were common sense, which it is in general relativity. The big problem with the standard physics is that it treats electrodynamics as Lorentz covariant, and treats the photon mass as being zero, thus contradicting light bending by gravitation. The standard faction's assertion that electromagnetic radiation is planar produces many problems cured by ECE. The standard argument collapses if the photon mass is non zero, because the Proca equation is not gauge invariant. In ECE the gauge principle is discarded in favour of general covariance.
The real response to ECE is overwhelmingly positive as we see every day from feedback to this site.
All my LRL researches always pointed to that direction, specially now with my upcoming working system. I can't stress enough how rewarding a serious and deep study can be and how happy and proud I am.
It's extremely exciting getting out of the dark and going into the light to understand simply why and how MFDs work for instance.
Here's a portion of Dr. Evans' message, some editings done by me:
The B(3) field is the magnetic flux density of electromagnetic radiation observed in the magnetization of matter by electromagnetic radiation. It occurs only in a generally covariant unified field theory. It was inferred at Cornell in 1991 and published in Physica B in 1992. A notorious incident occurred in late 1992 when the PhysicaL Review E accepted a paper on B(3) and then "unaccepted" it. This incident was due to the fact that in the standard physics electromagnetic radiation in vacuo is supposed to be made up of plane waves, due to the standard assumption that the photon mass is zero. In ECE theory the photon mass is non-zero, and the B(3) field is generated by the spin connection of spacetime itself. The ECE description has been acccepted since then as being the required description of electromagnetic radiation, i.e. a generally covariant description unified with the description of gravitation. The attacks on the B(3) field in the early nineties were unscientific, as history has shown. They were orchestrated by the standard physics faction. First came an amateurish attempt by the physical chemist L. D. Barron using incorrect symmetry arguments based on nineteenth century concepts. ...
...Then came a subjective attack by the notorious A. Lakhtakia, known to be "Science Guy" on Wikipedia and known to be a cybserstalker and e mail abuser, an ally of the cyberstalker G. Bruhn recently warned by a barrister. Lakhtakia seemed to take a strong personal dislike to B(3), and his "paper", submitted to "Foundations of Physics Letters", described the field as "ghastly". Evidently the guy had no shaving mirror...
...I cannot take any of this stuff seriously now, a decade later. The Omnia Opera section from 1992 onwards gives a multitude of arguments in favour of B(3), first using an extended gauge theory of electromagnetism, and then ECE theory with finite photon mass. In great contrast to the cybsertsalkers of history, the eminent elder statesmen of relativity, Vigier and Wheeler, accepted the B(3) field as if it were common sense, which it is in general relativity. The big problem with the standard physics is that it treats electrodynamics as Lorentz covariant, and treats the photon mass as being zero, thus contradicting light bending by gravitation. The standard faction's assertion that electromagnetic radiation is planar produces many problems cured by ECE. The standard argument collapses if the photon mass is non zero, because the Proca equation is not gauge invariant. In ECE the gauge principle is discarded in favour of general covariance.
The real response to ECE is overwhelmingly positive as we see every day from feedback to this site.
Comment