Specific Frequencies For Gold

[B^C]

Gday Guy's,

Just wanted to compare findings with others who may have looked for & observed Specific Frequencies for Specific Targets--Eg--Au--Gold--etc.
Also I have read that some believe that higher Frequencies may be better for smaller targets.

I have read a lot about these subjects & opinions vary & so does the Frequency ranges of individual observations.

Taking into account that every different circuit has specific characteristics unique to it's own individual configuration.
I find that with my particular circuits & others i have assembled to observe specific things is that there are no specific frequencies to target Gold for example or smaller Targets.

I do find however that every individual Circuit does in fact have a specific Frequency where it will a lot more sensitive & therefore will pickup very small Targets compared to other Frequencies.
I find no specific Frequency for Gold though or other Targets which would seem contrary to other findings.

I have tested Frequencies from 1Hz to you don't want to know & then used other circuits to see if the results repeat themselves, again if find nothing but the particular circuit preffers particular Frequencies.

Has anyone observed a specific frequency for a specific target, with more than three completely different circuits?

[moodz]

... hmmm the frequency that I find gold at is about 0 hz

[WM6]

... hmmm the frequency that I find gold at is about 0 hz

sinus or sqare wave?

[hung]

sinus or sqare wave?

Sinus. Always.

[Max]

???

Still magic of crystals here...

People really belive gold emits some RF signal ???

Or that you need such particular frequency to make it resonate ???

Yes... there is... NMR is old stuff... but then ??? How to pack the magnets and how to confine the target in a small uniform field ???

Nobody explains that!

Just some other fool's idea... for the moron of the year championship!

Kind regards,
Max

[Fred]

We are progressing: we already know that we need to RECEIVE a 0hz SINUS wave, thanks to Hung.
That´s a hell of a wavelenght...

[homefire]

Check this out!

Resonate Freq of Gold is 1.729 Mhz.


This is what that freq has been allocated for in the US.

1705 - 1750 kHz Radiolocation [Part 90 Subpart F]
1708 kHz, Aeronautical Radionavigation Service
1722 kHz, Public Safety, Police, Base or mobile[90.20]
1730 kHz, Public Safety, Police, Base or mobile[90.20]
1750 - 1800 kHz Radiolocation [Part 90 Subpart F]
Disaster Communications Service [90.103(c)(7)]

[B^C]

Gday Kiddies,

I see humour is not a very strong point around here Haha.

Yes, there are some highly qualified people who do believe certain substances emit stronger signals at certain frequencies, including NASA, i believe it is hogwash! --Egg on face to everybody who replied--
Maybe this is due to the outdated basic pre schoolish signals we use?

However the only way to find out is to have a look & try to observe things, it's better than believing what you read on the Internet by people who have little idea & follow along like sheep.
In Australia we call these guy's --WANKERS!

Testing things is better than believing what you read especially when it comes to PI Detectors & obviously 99.9% of the population have it completely wrong anyway!..............

That's why they can't compete with ML.

There are also people who believe in reading time constants or return signals of targets after the main event as well or return signals themselves. Or reading after the flyback transient! They have it wrong also!

Now if you all stand up & look in the mirror & say to yourselves ---I HAVE NO IDEA--- then maybe you may take a closer look, but if you think you know more than NASA well then there's no hope!.

All jokes aside, i have not read one thing on this forum or any other for that matter on how a GOOD PI detector "actually" works, so maybe feeble humour does belong here after all?

I am now detecting a 1grm nugget at 4" deeper than the GPX4500 i have in bad ground & reading earlier than anything on the market & maybe earlier than you believe?

I am detecting other non ferrous metals a near twice the depth of the 4500, this has me scratching my head at the moment as i get only 4" deeper on gold?????????.

Now Kiddies, if you want to reply with some real info do so but please don't embarrass yourselves before you realise what your talking about

[homefire]

Wankers Spank there Monkey!

No Monkey Spankin on my part.

Anything I post is just as valid as known to man.

If ML keeps Jacking there customers around there going to find them selves in the dust.

They Just did a turn around after out cry on servicing there older machines.

There are other machines out there that are all most as good at Less then Half the Price.

[WM6]

That's why they can't compete with ML.

What does the acronym ML here?

[homefire]

What does the acronym ML here?

Minelab Detectors!

[WM6]

Minelab Detectors!

Thanks!

Citation:

"That's why they can't compete with ML."

"I am detecting other non ferrous metals a near twice the depth of the 4500"

End of Citation B^C.

Which detector is in question, 4500 is Minelab too?

[homefire]

http://www.nuggetshooter.ipbhost.com...inelab+repairs

[WM6]

http://www.nuggetshooter.ipbhost.com...inelab+repairs

Thank you. Interesting.

Solution is homelab, homemade and homerepair.

[B^C]

Gday All,

Guys, like it or not, i think we have to be fair to Minelab, you have to remember that now there owned by another company.
The Aussies that owned it before were honourable & they strove for the best--regardless!
Now there owned by an international company the $$$$ will rule--regardless!.

The Minelab bashers are a jealous lot that embarrass themselves--regardless!! We call them Wannabees.

Think about it, how can you have a go & discredit things when there the best there is--doesn't make sense?

I can foresee that Minelab will slowly roll downhill now it's own by another company with different principles & an unscrupulous business sense.

Then again if they still let THE MAN Mr Candy have a free reign well then they may succeed even further but more than likely they will think they know more & sidetrack this genious of a man.

Mr Candy Made Minelab, this foreign company will do well to remember this!
--------------------------------------


ML---Is Minelab.

Yes, i agree there are machines that are "almost" as good, but not better, hence there price. Almost as good is only almost as good.
I almost found a 1000 oz nugget, it just isn't the same as, i found a 1000 oz nugget

I find, Half the price, half as good--unfortunately.

I have a new circuit i have been working on frantically & infact i can detect non ferrous metals at near double the distance of the GPX4500 but gold is only around 4" more?.

I set out then to try to work this out & had a closer look just with air testing of the GPX4500.
The big surprise was that the 4500 is NOT sensitive to Aluminium Foil, this surprised me because i have always thought that the foil test was a good test for sensitivity?
Apparently not, at least not for Gold!

The 4500 can detect a small 1grm nugget at around 18cm but a 1" square of Aluminium foil at only about 5cm.
I have set my test circuit so i can detect the Aluminium Foil at 30cm but then it can only detect the 1grm nugget at around 18cm the same as the 4500.
Now if i detune it on the foil i can increase the detection distance of the 1grm nugget?.

This i don't understand & obviously i am missing the point, maybe someone else can explain this?

I have a piece of copper as well & the 4500 can detect this at 18cm & my circuit easily detects this at 40cm but still the bloody gold is only 10cm better???

I can detect an Australian $1 coin approx 25mm diameter at 30cm, this is also the same as the 4500?

AAARRRGGGHHH!

Tired & Frustrated!