It is surely greatly conserved by tank capacitances and the Q factor for each frequency. In fact, there are very little losses in interaction with the soil, so it is mostly the coil resistance that spoils the Q.
Long ago I played with such digital waveforms to synthesize sine-like exciters, not to exaggerate harmonics but to suppress them. A nice and surprisingly clean signal is obtained using two shifted f/3 waveforms, but that one has a zero half the time and must be realised as a bridge. It could be used to improve tone for the most of the nowadays detectors.
This V3 thing has a non-return-to-zero output so it narrows the choice of usable waveforms. But surely it can do any combination of the (f1, f2, f3), and not necessarily all of them together. Maybe it is the way it achieves the depth that is advertised. Some extra 10dB juice using a single frequency ... not bad.
Long ago I played with such digital waveforms to synthesize sine-like exciters, not to exaggerate harmonics but to suppress them. A nice and surprisingly clean signal is obtained using two shifted f/3 waveforms, but that one has a zero half the time and must be realised as a bridge. It could be used to improve tone for the most of the nowadays detectors.
This V3 thing has a non-return-to-zero output so it narrows the choice of usable waveforms. But surely it can do any combination of the (f1, f2, f3), and not necessarily all of them together. Maybe it is the way it achieves the depth that is advertised. Some extra 10dB juice using a single frequency ... not bad.
Comment