the depest detector

[danny475bek]

hi all
can any one give me the deepest detector
there are too many detectors and choosing from them is a very complex so can any one help me in this i need the depest one whill using 1\1m serch coil or biger one
thank you all
danny

[Funfinder]

not depest or deapest but: deepest!

http://www.makrodetector.com/default...id=127&setLg=1

"The Deapest Detector In The World" now is written there.


Perhaps there exists deeper ones but not at this price level.

further info here:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16374

[Qiaozhi]

not depest or deapest but: deepest!

http://www.makrodetector.com/default...id=127&setLg=1

"The Deapest Detector In The World" now is written there.


Perhaps there exists deeper ones but not at this price level.

further info here:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16374

Let's hope the same person who created the home page of their website didn't write the software as well.

"Deepest" and "excellent" are both spelled incorrectly.

[kt315]

not depest or deapest but: deepest!

http://www.makrodetector.com/default...id=127&setLg=1

"The Deapest Detector In The World" now is written there.


Perhaps there exists deeper ones but not at this price level.

further info here:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16374

Qiao, take attention how he gives a link on GEOTECH. Geotech is like still one place for their advertising if the site is nicely indexed in all famous seachers. you and me, Carl Moreland, ivconic too, and many others members are only Jeohunter - Visual Ground Scanner Tech Forum.
this billionaire is able to buy you with your family and this forum.

[WM6]

Jeohunter unusable toy can only be deepest if it was thrown in the Pacific trench.

[danny475bek]

hi

thank you all about the web sites and information
i dont know why all the users are looking at the spelling or dictation mistakes
we are not in a oxford univercity we are in a small group and we have to help each other
thanks

[pebe]

We may not be in Oxford University, but even a modest amount of punctuation will help the reader understand what is being written.

I'm fed up with having to read and re-read a sentence many times to try to find out what the writer intended, because there is not a dot or comma to be found.

I'm sure most people had a reasonable education, so leaving out punctuation can only be considered 'sloppy' and careless.

[Funfinder]

Jeohunter unusable toy can only be deepest if it was thrown in the Pacific trench.

Bad joke... Your attitude is unusable, WM6, and far away in dreamland.


@ all

I was searching now ca. 25 times à 5-10 hours with the Jeohunter and I like this MD more and more.

The Jeohunter - if you search at 90-100% sensitivity - goes really the most deep for an usual to handle MD.

What I want to say with this in other words is if you like to search deep without all those limits and stuff other deep detectors have.

You don't need a second person, you can hold a steel shovel and a bag with your finds in the other hand while searching but with high sensitivity settings this detector already is on the limit of interacting with your body and what you're taking with you.

Cheap MDs even won't recognise if your boots have steel-caps - with the Jeohunter you "find" them already at 60% sens if you're holding the search coil too close to your feet.

This MD really is so high sensitive that it is on the "practical limit" for "convinient" searching. This is not negative - perhaps for some weak and rapid unmotivatable softeggs - but a big plus - getting the most possible power out of a MD!

With its really large standard coil you can search even through large areas very fast and the weight depends just alot how far away from your feet the coil is swept.

I like it as example if the coil is almost 70cm (2feet) away from them because of the much better search-radius, but because of the law of leverage the more distance the expotential more weight.

For me this is no problem because I simply change the search arm every few minutes.



The REAL problem in fact is a completly other thing:

The real deep objects most of the time are really seldom!!!

With the Jeohunter you can find large metal objects 2-4m (and even more) deep - just those are extremly rare!

But the big advantage is that you always can be shure that you haven't missed anything important!

With usual MDs (especially so called Coinhunters) you never can be shure if there really is nothing valuable a little bit deeper down there - and this is absolutly frustrating!


We also can make a range chart:

coinhunters - 50-300 $$ - 0-50cm
usual MDs - 200-1000 $$ - 0-150cm
profi MDs - 800 - x000 $$ - 0-10m

Now because most of the stuff is not deeper than 150cm a usual MD works well and because of the smaller coil it's easier to use and better for smaller finds like coins.

Until a certain depth and for smaller stuff those are best choice - and most of the time the finds are within the search-range of those MDs.


But you never know what kind of treasure is beyond the depth limit those semi-professional machines have!

[kt315]

this guy in attach did trip in Turkey...especcialy for to test the deepest... be very accurate if you believe in Allakh... Allakh is Great, but Mohhamed appointed do not LIE everybody

... beside jew-christians folks.

[Funfinder]

@ kt315
If gods would be really good, they would have created the same beautiful paradise existence for every living beeing and not such an unjustice dirty world with unbeliefable pain, horror and death!

So better forget all those gods and better translate for us what's there written!

[Funfinder]

Cannonball #3

The success gives me and the Jeohunter right!!!



@WM6
Your arguments and comments are poor, because you miss the real treasure-hunting experience!

I really respect your electronical competence but that should at least lead into some real useful MD improvements and not just in cynical comments about Hitec you know s**t about!



@ all
2h ago searched only for 30min and found my third cannonball - the biggest one this time - 12cm diameter and over 5kg heavy! Around 30-40cm below.

Good that 3 weeks ago I made these bag-improvements:
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...8&postcount=95

Didn't even checked the analyses sceen! 'Iron off' and 80% sensitivity - a huge signal, I digged it and: Bingo!

" 'Iron off' and you find an iron cannon ball???" ...you may ask? Well, alot if not all MDs have problems to disc. very old special iron that is sphere-shaped but I won't call it a problem! It's much better this way, so I can skip the little nails etc. stuff but still find the valuable old things!

If you really need a very deep going MD get the Jeo, it's the best value for it's price! But this is no toy you can play for a half hour and getting bored because it's too complicated and heavy or better powerful for you.


In this world for shure exist things those are absolutly just too good for some persons (like a Harley for a little kid...) and thats why it turns out "negative" for them! But be fair and think twice who's really to blame!

[WM6]

@ all
2h ago searched only for 30min and found my third cannonball - the biggest one this time - 12cm diameter and over 5kg heavy!

I cannot understand why you purchase those canniball version?

[mikebg]

I cannot understand why you purchase those canniball version?

Cannibal or man-eater? (I think the purchaser of this machine is money-eater:-)