Nexus Challenge

[Qiaozhi]

Here are the details of the challenge (from Georgi Chauschev)

"The Nexus challenge is for underground and air. Anytime, anywhere. Search coils on the compared detectors have to be approximately the same over all size. Type of detectors are irrelevant. I will compete against any type."

[WM6]

Here are the details of the challenge (from Georgi Chauschev)

"The Nexus challenge is for underground and air. Anytime, anywhere. Search coils on the compared detectors have to be approximately the same over all size. Type of detectors are irrelevant. I will compete against any type."

What mean same over all size of coil? Nexus is OO type, so which dimension are taken as comparable "Height" or "Lenght"?

[ApBerg]

Here are the details of the challenge (from Georgi Chauschev)

"The Nexus challenge is for underground and air. Anytime, anywhere. Search coils on the compared detectors have to be approximately the same over all size. Type of detectors are irrelevant. I will compete against any type."

http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11831

Qiaozhi..... you claimed it can find it .... so....go for it ??

If Carl can test it ... you have proof it can do it...

[ApBerg]

Here are the details of the challenge (from Georgi Chauschev)

"The Nexus challenge is for underground and air. Anytime, anywhere. Search coils on the compared detectors have to be approximately the same over all size. Type of detectors are irrelevant. I will compete against any type."

Sorry... I do not have a detector that can find a helmet at 1.90 meters deep in the ground...

So Qiaozhi and Georgi.... you are winning ...Congratulations.....

[Qiaozhi]

http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11831

Qiaozhi..... you claimed it can find it .... so....go for it ??

What do you mean? ... "go for it" ... there is no prize money.

Apparently, Mike Longfield has the original cache buried in his test area. Anyone is welcome to go along with their favourite detector and try to detect it. You can contact him here -> http://www.metaldetectors.gbr.cc/

[Qiaozhi]

Sorry... I do not have a detector that can find a helmet at 1.90 meters deep in the ground...

So Qiaozhi and Georgi.... you are winning ...Congratulations.....

It's only Georgi and Nexus that are winning, not me.

[ApBerg]

What do you mean? ... "go for it" ... there is no prize money.

Apparently, Mike Longfield has the original cache buried in his test area. Anyone is welcome to go along with their favourite detector and try to detect it. You can contact him here -> http://www.metaldetectors.gbr.cc/

What do you mean? ... "go for it" ... there is no prize money.


I mean that you can proof what you claim..... that must be worth more than some prize money........

I think that Nexus detectors can be good detectors but the claims made are hard to believe.....

This is my last response in this topic.... like to stay friends...

Best regards

Ap

[Fred]

It's only Georgi and Nexus that are winning, not me.

[Qiaozhi]

This is my last response in this topic.... like to stay friends..

[ivconic]

Again; i haven't seen nor tested any Nexus so far, yet i would challenge it with XP!
It doesn't matter which one; Gold Max Power or Gmaxx II... or even Deus!
But to be clear; XP should carry similar sized coil as Nexus.
Gmaxx II with larger coil is deepest beast i have seen so far.
Deus i have seen only with small coil, yet it outperformed all others with similar size coils.
So would be very interesting to collect all those machines and coils and compare them!
Also there is another one which is so rarely mentioned lately: Explorer SE!
Usually Explorer SE tests (i've seen so far) were done mostly by people who obviously do not know how to adjust it properly and operate with it.
Was it purposely? I can't tell.
But i got impression that Explorer SE is taken there, on those tests, to serve just as the "worse" one,
because it is expensive and coming from the great Minelab which we all do know is the No1 in these matters, yet all of us are not so ready to admit that.
It is usually like that: the best one is always taking the heat.
That's why is "the best" after all!
But watching all those videos i always noticed that somehow Explorer is not adjusted so to give best performances but contrary!?
To pull out maximum performances from detector, man must know how to adjust it.
It took me 2 weeks to fully learn and understand how to operate Explorer,
although before that i was sure in my knowledge and capabilities and took Explorer for granted, just like that!
But on very first me going outdoor with it - it slammed back me to my head!
I was unable to locate anything at more descent depths with it than!
Than it took 2 long weeks of learning and understanding.
So... it is pretty unreal and trivial to talk about some machine, just like that, before you knowing it better and collect some working experience with it.
So i am not saying nothing about final results, but i suggest
XP, Explorer and Nexus to be fairly tested together, similar coils sizes and same testing conditions.
Also people who are performing such test to be fully capable to adjust those machines... and of course to be fair!

[salih]

my md, I think is like nexus

hello 2 all
if you like it pls but http://youtu.be/Gay6ooa1GzA

[Qiaozhi]

hello 2 all
if you like it pls but http://youtu.be/Gay6ooa1GzA

Although your detector superficially resembles a Nexus, due to the OO coil, you still have some work to do regarding depth.

I presume you are not releasing a schematic?

[salih]

Although your detector superficially resembles a Nexus, due to the OO coil, you still have some work to do regarding depth.

I presume you are not releasing a schematic?

By the way my coil is 18cm Inside the search head not 9 Inch

[mario]

I'd love to put my baby through this test....unfortunately, it's seeing a lot of down time (for mods) as of late.

Maybe I need a back up.

[Qiaozhi]

By the way my coil is 18cm Inside the search head not 9 Inch

Have a look at the 4" coil tests ->
http://www.nexusdetectors.com/metaldetectortests1.html