Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

depth review - including TGS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • depth review - including TGS

    http://www.staffsmetaldetectors.co.u..._halfpenny.htm


    The C scopes dont do well in this test

  • #2
    Detector test

    Here's another site with some interesting results, standardardised test and INGO test
    http://www.metalldetektortest.eu/belgientest.html

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Kliner.

      The Garrets were poor - a sea of red crosses.
      Minelabs - a sea of green ticks.

      I guess this hobby is like most others - you need to spend a months wages to get something that works real well.

      Comment


      • #4
        either that , or the tests / results were biased in some way maybe ?

        sponsored by minelab maybe ?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by golfnut View Post
          http://www.staffsmetaldetectors.co.u..._halfpenny.htm


          The C scopes dont do well in this test
          Looking at the results, and noting the complete lack of details concerning how the measurements were performed, I would conclude these are simply air tests.

          For instance, the Viking 5 (Old Type) and the Tesoro Vaquero (with widescan coil) have the same results. As we all know, tests in real soil are very different.

          Comment

          Working...
          X