Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Blisstool detector

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by UFO View Post
    Yes it is a poor machine made by *****.

    It will find money, only in the pockets of unsuspecting buyers.

    You would be better off with almost anything else.

    Everything that surrounds it is very suspicious, including the so-called American distributor.

    As mentioned above, it is a molested copy of a Fisher 1266.

    Try a kit from Silver dog, or even find an older 1266, you will be better off.
    Quite right!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by target View Post
      some say good some say no good.
      but i have a deus and it wont see a gold chain if you rub it over the bottom of the coil ,so if the V3 can see a gold chain even on the beach surface then thats better than what the deus can see .

      the blisstoll haters have never even tried it so look at the comments on the dankowski forum

      http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/di...ad.php?2,24714

      for a balanced view
      And this can be also found on those pages:

      "..The owner of Blisstool is a robotics scientist that owns Kibertron and has used his expertise to develop the machines over a few years. The owner of Nexus was an employee of his..."

      This is easy to check. Nexus owner and one of our friends from here are good friends. He can check this claim.
      ...

      "...i have a deus and it wont see a gold chain if you rub it over the bottom of the coil.."

      This is hard to believe, excuse me. I have Deus too. In case you are telling the truth here, than:

      1) Either: your Deus is broken,
      2) either: chain is not made from metal but from plastic,
      3) either: you do not know how to adjust Deus, although; all you have to do is to use GMP program or Fast... or few others.
      4) either: you are not telling the truth here (sorry)


      I am not Blisstool "hater" at all. Have nothing against that detector nor it's owner.
      I only don't want to see false claims (like on Deus)...

      Cheers!

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by ivconic View Post

        He can check this claim.
        ...
        !
        Already checked on previous "Blisstoll LTC64" topic.

        Claim is misleading and not true:

        http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...2&postcount=47

        Comment


        • #19
          I found that they have a USA website with video made here so ,some people must have it.
          http://www.blisstoolusa.com/Demonstration_Video.html

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by ivconic View Post
            And this can be also found on those pages:

            "..The owner of Blisstool is a robotics scientist that owns Kibertron and has used his expertise to develop the machines over a few years. The owner of Nexus was an employee of his..."

            This is easy to check. Nexus owner and one of our friends from here are good friends. He can check this claim.
            ...
            I have already this question in the other thread ->
            http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showp...2&postcount=47

            Comment


            • #21
              I skipped that earlier.
              Just as i thought.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by target View Post

                but i have a deus and it wont see a gold chain if you rub it over the bottom of the coil
                Sure, You forgot turn it ON (assume intentionally):

                http://youtu.be/Y1Wht1CG5F8

                Comment


                • #23
                  But this is pretty good Blisstoll LTC64 test - not much to remark:

                  http://youtu.be/sbe6FWBZwes

                  I wish to see (about) 1gram natural gold nugget test (in soil of course).

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by UFO View Post
                    Yes it is a poor machine made by *****.

                    It will find money, only in the pockets of unsuspecting buyers.

                    You would be better off with almost anything else.

                    Everything that surrounds it is very suspicious, including the so-called American distributor.

                    As mentioned above, it is a molested copy of a Fisher 1266.

                    Try a kit from Silver dog, or even find an older 1266, you will be better off.

                    Originally posted by holyuser View Post
                    Quite right!
                    Absolute ridiculous bullsh*t!

                    I have both, the 1266-X and the Bliss and the later is much better!

                    Especially because you can't get the 1266x completly quiet without
                    Mod and the Blisstool ist 35-45% deeper.

                    This erratic-noise high senitivity level sometimes even me drives mad
                    but all those Blisstool haters should consider that the Fisher 1266-X
                    with exactly such "noise-method" at it's time (from the early '90s
                    upwards) was one of the most wanted and deep machines ever!

                    btw. the crazy beeping orgies of the Ace 250 is nothing against
                    the somelike "white noise" sounding output of the Fisher or
                    Blisstool and some prefer to hear all the targets, even the
                    "bad" ones, so they can choose all the time to dig or not dig.

                    And it even signalizes interesting mineralic stones or
                    cavities by double-beep alot other MDs can't detect at all!


                    It's absolutly irresponsible of ivconic to give such answers
                    to a truth-seeking person already in the very first beginning!

                    Just shut up if the method of detection the Blisstool provides
                    isn't your taste but don't spread evil lies and such stuff.

                    Extreme depth has it's price, may it be weight or instability
                    or eletromagnetic noise or whatever! Take it or leave it!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Funfinder View Post
                      Absolute ridiculous bullsh*t!
                      This is only true for thanksgiving blistul-noise you churn out.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        "...you can't get the 1266x completly quiet .."

                        You can if you adjust Sense a bit lower than maximum.
                        Disc1 at 4, Disc2 at 6, Sense at 80%.
                        1266 is calm than, very calm.
                        But if you adjust any Disc lower than 3, than it may even accept mineralization, hotrocks etc...
                        Also it is not immune on HV. Can't be quiet in HV line vicinity, railroad vicinity ... etc..
                        1266 is also not known as extreme deep detector. Therefore you can't compare it with those which are known as deep.
                        I bet Blisstool is much deeper than 1266, that's we can agree on, no problem.


                        "...It's absolutly irresponsible of ivconic to give such answers
                        to a truth-seeking person already in the very first beginning!...
                        "

                        Would be irresponsible if i lied something, anything. I hope i didn't!
                        All i said here is truth about Deus and can be checked by anyone.
                        Deus can detect tiny golden chain. On Bliss demonstration video it is showed it can't!?
                        How come? Than i took my Deus and tested it. It can detect golden chain, easy just like that.
                        So what's irresponsible here in my words?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Has anyone considered that the Blisstool looks like a improved circuit copy of the under rated GC1023/MD1023....... also known as Gold Century or Goldsnoop??

                          Am i seeing things on the circuit board that others are not......or maybe this latest V.L.F analog technology has advanced so much that this Blisstool detector is so superior to all other detectors on the market, even with its simple design.

                          Seems to be a copy of a existing detector..... with all possible external knobs available to the user for all soil conditions around the world.

                          Have no problem with this being done. Just need some answers....
                          What are your thoughts?

                          Sido HH

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            "...is so superior to all other detectors on the market, even with its simple design..."

                            You got that right!
                            You can't pull out extraordinary performances from simple analogue design.
                            All you can pull out from those are average, maybe descent performances... and snake oil for naive customers!


                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by sido View Post

                              Seems to be a copy of a existing detector..... with all possible external knobs available to the user for all soil conditions around the world.
                              You mean this? By conversion trimmers to pots?


                              Some of LTC64 tests are very promising. I wish to see 1gram gold nugget test in soil and some stability tests on "heavy" terrain.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Hi Ivconic, Hard to believe myself, but this Blisstool looks so familiar to a Goldsnoop, MD1023/GC1023.

                                What the key is to its so great performance is probably the better constructed 11" and 15" coil and testing done on low to medium mineralized soils. It is possible to achieve these results in some soil conditions.

                                Bring this unit in Victoria/Australia goldfields and most likely it will perform like a average high end V.L.F Detector, due to lowering the gain to a usable point.

                                High Mineralised ground here will make it almost unusable with the setting presented on the videos so far.

                                Cheers Sido

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X