Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quasar

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    i do not know who this guy but he sells Quasar ARM boards

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/PCB-board-of...sAAOSwQoFWOKke

    Comment


    • #32
      some pics in link
      http://dnepropetrovsk.dnp.olx.ua/oby...m-IDebT8O.html

      Comment


      • #33
        Thank you for the board pics, kt315. I have bought exactly that PCB from him and it arrived quickly. Good price and fast shipping. A few parts are still missing, i hope to complete the PCB soon.

        Comment


        • #34
          on sale few of board Quasar ARM selling by Andy_F
          http://www.md4u.ru/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=9936
          pics inside the link

          Comment


          • #35
            Has anyone any experience of this detector. looked at building one last year but the YouTube videos were lest than impressive.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Koala View Post
              Has anyone any experience of this detector. looked at building one last year but the YouTube videos were lest than impressive.
              look pics in this thread http://www.md4u.ru/viewtopic.php?f=95&t=8589

              Comment


              • #37
                Thanks kt315

                This video in the thread gained my interest again.

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zKPs0Fzss0&feature=youtu.be

                However would have like to see what happens with smaller coins.

                Comment


                • #38
                  what smaller coins you mean? i am not in course of UK ancient coins. russian people use 5 kopeek of USSR, some coins of XIX century. smaller is silver coins of XVI-XV century...

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I meant small coin in the video

                    With my Bandido and there is a big difference with coin size and testing. With a large coin it can be touching a rusty nail and still be detected. However a cut half, sixpence or sovereign penny the best I can do is 1/2 the coil diameter or 3"


                    Here is what I have been testing with


                    ~Click image for larger version

Name:	WIN_20151201_12_20_48_Pro.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	269.2 KB
ID:	344175

                    We should come up with a standard test for recovery speed. I compare my home built against YouTube's "Norfolk wolf" test of a cut half and nail

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuASrFUdxQQ


                    Depth in fields near me is rarely the limiting factor

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      sorry, have nothing possibility to show something in english. seems Quasar ARM is unknown in your part of net, but it is not so big problem.

                      only russian... here is Part #2. guy tells about getting parcel with a kit...
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRWB9faZZ_w

                      part #3. the guy tells about components at the Quasar pcb soldering.
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AREDK-qHIHc

                      part #4. turning on and some tests.
                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ilas1g5dXkk

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Listen to what this guy has to say about the coin nail test -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeeNb6F9xMY
                        It makes a lot of sense, and is consistent with the results I get in my test garden. Even small ferrous stuff on the surface can mask out coins a few inches deep.

                        However, there is a variation on the wood, nail, coin test that involves placing the coin at a lower level than the nails. If you try that, you'll be surprised at some of the detectors that will fail dismally. This variation is consistent with the comments in the video, and with testing in the ground.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Kinda gone off topic and taking away from the Quasar which looks interesting. When I have some time will read through the threads on the other forum and make a decision whether to build one.

                          "However, there is a variation on the wood, nail, coin test that involves placing the coin at a lower level than the nails. If you try that, you'll be surprised at some of the detectors that will fail dismally. This variation is consistent with the comments in the video, and with testing in the ground"

                          I start a thread on here about this test. People who have identical size coils DD and concentric found that the DDs past the test and the concentric failed. I could not test for myself as I only have a 10" DD and 8" concentric for my IDX and 6" concentric for my Bandido.


                          To find target as close as possible to iron requires two thing. Good separation and quick recovery. As far as I can tell separation is purely due to the coil and recovery the detector.

                          Edit found thread

                          http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?22702-Iron-masking



                          Back to the Quasar it looks to have good recovery and sensitivity to small targets so may well be a nice project for me.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X