QED

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

Why with all your smarts Aziz you are not helping Bugwhiskers and Doug get the QED working and out in the hands of blokes looking for a gold detector better than a Minelab?

[Aziz]

Why with all your smarts Aziz you are not helping Bugwhiskers and Doug get the QED working and out in the hands of blokes looking for a gold detector better than a Minelab?

Hi PJ,

why don't you and your smart mates help me?
I HAVE MASSIVE HARMONICS(C)(R)(TM) PROBLEMS!!!

Cheers,
Aziz

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

Aziz, I know your mentor (Doug) follows this forum, but will not post for the reason of so many people think he a bit on the twisted side. But no need for you to be afraid of him here. I would sure like to see you produce a working detector with your world beating ground balance you brag so much about. I did not say your design has a harmonic problem. Just Bugwhiskers QED design has it. But both you and I know he will never admit it. Maybe in a couple more years of the "about to be done" statements it might be ready.

Here is hoping that soon you show the world your ground breaking, worlds best ground balance you have developed! Good luck, I hope you make a million!

[dougAEGPF]

Very interesting!Can you tell me what circuit or circuit components in the QED that you allege are causing the harmonic problems and how,when and why they are manifested? Do you have the schematic for the QED detector or the source code for the MC? dougAEGPF

[Aziz]

*LOL*

I see a lot of dis-harmonics!!! Between the finders and AEGP forum.
Beware of the non-synchronized harmonics. As long as the harmonics are synchronized to your experiment (measurement), they won't be an issue.

Aziz

[Aziz]

Aziz, I know your mentor (Doug) follows this forum, but will not post for the reason of so many people think he a bit on the twisted side. But no need for you to be afraid of him here. I would sure like to see you produce a working detector with your world beating ground balance you brag so much about. I did not say your design has a harmonic problem. Just Bugwhiskers QED design has it. But both you and I know he will never admit it. Maybe in a couple more years of the "about to be done" statements it might be ready.

Here is hoping that soon you show the world your ground breaking, worlds best ground balance you have developed! Good luck, I hope you make a million!

Hi PJ,

I don't know much of the internals of the QED. But you are just speculating here.

Yep, the "MadLabs Inc." ground balancing is the "World's best ground balancing and discriminating technology". Even the ML (market leader) can't do it better. But the "MadLabs Inc." first mad engineer does it.

Who's going to make a million? Not me! (BTW, I'm scheiss reich! - I'm $hite rich!). I'm a poor-man's supporter. I rather would give the technology for free rather than seing someone else ripping off a lot of folks. Well, that's going to be happen some day. Who knows.

Cheers,
Aziz

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

dougAEGPF

What would cause this reaction in a PI gold detector then if not harmonics?

"Some time back I was out detecting/testing with Alluvium.
My detector was switched on and the coil was sitting flat on the ground. Alluvium was around 15 metres away and his detector was on also.
Alluvium dropped a $1 coin on the ground and proceeded to swing the coil over it. To my dismay I could here my detector's audio responding as if I was the one swinging the coil over the coin. There is no way that my detector was picking up the signal from the target but rather the modulation of Alluvium's TX field as he swung over the target".

I am sure you would be able to tell us all for the sake of science.

[dougAEGPF]

What you refer to is modulation of the Rx audio much like AM/FM radio.It happens with ML detectors and perhaps some others? When one detector goes over a target if another detector is close enough then you hear the target response in this detector. ie the Rx audio from the first detector is modulated when it goes over a target and this can be picked up by the Rx of another. Can you show some CRO shots from the QED to illustrate the alleged harmonic problems it has?
dougAEGPF.
http://australianelectronicgoldprosp...y-bugwhiskers/

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

Doug your little game will not work here demanding answers to your silly questions. Lets see you prove it does not has a problem. Or why it not on the market after years and years of say it will be ready any day now. The ONUS is on "you" Doug after all your years of bagging.

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

And please no silly name calling like on your forum. Lets keep it civil and not threaten with banning if you or I can not give you the answer you like.

Again Doug you are what I consider one of my best friends in the world!

[dougAEGPF]

Doug your little game will not work here demanding answers to your silly questions. Lets see you prove it does not has a problem. Or why it not on the market after years and years of say it will be ready any day now. The ONUS is on "you" Doug after all your years of bagging.

You have made the assertion that the QED has a problem with harmonics.What folk here would like to know i am sure is why you allege it has this problem and on what do you base your assertion?
Have you tested or used the QED? Is their a problem in the QED circuit or the circuit layout or any circuit components that is causing the harmonic problemt; if so could you please tell us? Are you familiar with the QED circuit and the MC source code? dougAEGPF

[UrbanFox]

What you refer to is modulation of the Rx audio much like AM/FM radio.It happens with ML detectors and perhaps some others?

I have not seen any interference/audio interaction when using my Minelab around other detector users. Admittedly, I would normally never detect within around 5-6 meters of another detector, and would typically give other detector users a reasonably wide berth in the field.

I seem to remember a reference on your forum to being able to hear the local radio station through the QED audio. Was that a "design feature" also?

No matter how I tuned my Minelab, I just cannot tune in my local radio stations.

I have to admit, though, being able to hear the response from another detector could be good when instructing another detector user.

Also, you could have stumbled upon the design for wireless headphones there. Maybe another patent is in order!!

[bugwhiskers]

It's no use asking PJ or UrbanFox questions as their technical knowledge and credibility is zilch. Each post they make will confirm this and expose their motivation.
Their rants are disrupting Aziz's contribution towards producing a better detector at a better price.

[dougAEGPF]

And please no silly name calling like on your forum. Lets keep it civil and not threaten with banning if you or I can not give you the answer you like.

Again Doug you are what I consider one of my best friends in the world!

Your assertion that the QED has “harmonic problems” has absolutely no basis in fact! I know having tested and used a QED (and found gold with it), and have seen many bench testing results!


dougAEGPF

[dougAEGPF]

I have not seen any interference/audio interaction when using my Minelab around other detector users. Admittedly, I would normally never detect within around 5-6 meters of another detector, and would typically give other detector users a reasonably wide berth in the field.

I seem to remember a reference on your forum to being able to hear the local radio station through the QED audio. Was that a "design feature" also?

No matter how I tuned my Minelab, I just cannot tune in my local radio stations.

ML's do the same thing in the same location( which is very near to the local radio transmitter)however the effect can be hard to hear with ML's in this location because of severe power line induced and other EMI effects with the ML .
dougAEGPF