QED

[bugwhiskers]

So! Than go there and tell them that in their faces.
I would like to see here more technical debate on posted schematic.
Man shared schematic and now is up to us whether we gonna learn something from it or not.
...
Looking at few posted videos i can't resist against "Minelab behavior" impression that i have watching those. Maybe a clue?

If you have any questions on the schematic (or the videos) fire away.

[ivconic]

If you have any questions on the schematic (or the videos) fire away.

Thanks!
For me everything is a question, because i am not PI expert, yet i would like to learn.
What i would like to read here is not answer on one question but author's detailed explanation of all the processes that's going on in.
Of course, we all will understand author's need to keep certain aspects secret.
Other words; i am not asking for a code, but would like to read details on each stage, from front end up to speaker.
As an example; something like Carl did in his HH articles.
That's how we can turn this funny thread in more proper direction.
Cheers!

[bugwhiskers]

There is not a huge difference in the analogue sections of PI detectors. Perhaps if you study the HH and circuit description first you may be in a better position to ask about the differences.

[Aziz]

Oh dear! ... that doesn't bode well for this current discussion.

This reminds me of the old Batman TV series ... "Tune in next week, same time, same bat channel" ... POW! WHAM! ZAP!

Yep, we all had a lot of funny times & action.
This thread indeed might have caused the last straw that broke the camel's back. That's probably the reason, why Bugs published the schematics.

Cheers, POW! WHAM! ZAP!
Aziz

[ivconic]

There is not a huge difference in the analogue sections of PI detectors. Perhaps if you study the HH and circuit description first you may be in a better position to ask about the differences.

Can you post schematic in better resolution?

[WM6]

What i would like to read here is not answer on one question but author's detailed explanation of all the processes that's going on in.

Whole story started (well explained) here, and then advanced (patented too - btw. QED patend is good reading) from public to more close team development:

http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...ht=bugwhiskers

For better resolution of BW schematic, one need to R-click and chose "picture preview", then L-click on schematic for magnifying and then save it.

[ivconic]

Whole story started (well explained) here, and then advanced (patented too - btw. QED patend is good reading) from public to more close team development:

http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...ht=bugwhiskers

Thanks!
I missed that (like i missed so many other stuff).
Well, i will start reading from the beginning!
Cheers!

[bugwhiskers]

The attached PDF is essential reading. It is the Genesis of PI Ground Balance and variations of it are still being patented on a regular basis.

[Carl-NC]

The dispute is going on for many years.

This is the crux of the problem. The questions are, why is there a dispute, and why has it been going on for many years?

[WM6]

This is the crux of the problem. The questions are, why is there a dispute, and why has it been going on for many years?

It is not a problem. All is purposeful. Why not to exploit ML fans for free QED promotion?

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

It is not a problem. All is purposeful. Why not to exploit ML fans for free QED promotion?

I would dare say Minelab fans are not showing good faith promotions for the QED. You missed the point Carl was making.

I would love to see the QED come out and be a better gold detector than Minelabs latest model. But after so many years of bashing Minelab and its users, people have a right to question Dougs public relations and tactics. It has been told that it is going to be ready so many times that it is hard to believe what is going on with the QED.

Just like the Nemesis detector and a few others.

So WM6, do you think Doug is a good person for public relations on the QED?


I was also told Doug wanted one of his sheep to ask this question to me.

If you want to have some fun with patches junior over on geotech you could ask him to point out where in the QED schematic there are" harmonic problems!"
doug

Doug knows a schematic is different from a board layout. What was he thinking? Thanks goodness you did not fall for his silly question and ask me that! Good on ya my friend!

[bugwhiskers]

Patches Junior,

It's time for you to post the link that shows the "components too close together and causing harmonics"
It's also time to post the link to prove your claim that "four layer boards cause harmonics"
I still have the three screenshots of the wager you made before and after you edited the post . Just say the word and I will post them.

[Carl-NC]

A-yup, PJ is getting exactly what he wants out of the deal!

Carl's Rule #4.

[PATCHES JUNIOR]

Got ya a tad worried there Bugwhiskers? Just get back and get that QED out here and show Minelab how your gold detector is better.

[UrbanFox]

Bugs, PJ throws the ball and you snap at it. Are you really wanting to play the game? The way to take the ball from him is to Prove the ball doesn't exist. Alternately, don't snap at the ball. After a while he will get tired of always having to retrieve it himself.

Re any bets or wagers...did you accept while the offer was up? Ie, before it was taken down? At the horse races the odds do change, and the bookie can refuse bets by taking down the odds. Hopefully no horse in this race gets scratched or disqualified.