Tweet
-
-
like it...
-
I opened this thread with the hope that we will be dealing with artificial intelligence (AI) and not nonsense.
KT315, do you have to show up everywhere and completely screw up the topic?Comment
-
do you NOT REALLY want to see that my link is AI??? LOL! open your eyes, amigo. I AM SURE IN YOUR SENSE.Originally posted by ivconic View Post
yes, you have catched... i waited your same reply LOL!Comment
-
Greetings from Greece;
Comment
-
yet AI. take attention on words Fictional AI Band
@SamiSami-rx9jk
Baba bu grubu sayende rastgele keşfettim, bunca yıllık yaşıma ve müzisyenliğime rağmen hiç duymamıştım, ama bence bu bizim ayıbımız değil, ülkenin ayıbı, adamlar muhteşem ve neredeyse kimse bilmiyor
@tanozturk8698
kardeş kötü haberlerim var.. AI'ye yaptırmışlar!
- Thanks to you, I discovered this band by chance, despite all my years of age and musicianship I had never heard of it, but I think it's not our fault, it's the country's fault, the guys are amazing and almost no one knows about it.
- Brother, I have bad news for you.. They had AI do it!
Comment
-
KT315 your choices indicate that you are a big follower of "Village people"...
Comment
-
reminder YOU did this topic, not me. i give JUST AI. if you do not want to see FACTS but see just village people... do not smoke.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Looks like a classic finglonger.
Comment
-
The topic is called "AI" and the point of my jokes here is the fact that everything will boil down to the use of AI in the sense of an ordinary tool for faster and easier performance of banal and trivial tasks.
I remember the early 70s when I was in elementary school.
That's when the first "digitrons" (calculators) appeared on batteries and with a dark "display" and red numbers.
The teacher was very angry when one of the children used such a "digitron" for calculations.
This whole story about AI reminds me directly of that time, I'm not sure why.
Comment
-
Since the advent of Arduino; I'm back in the world of programming.
I was a professional programmer in the late 80's and did "serious" (at the time) software for various companies. Of course in Cobol!
From then until the advent of the Arduino, I did almost nothing.
Since the appearance of Arduino, I started learning C++ again and then reduced the whole story to adapted Cpp for Arduino.
From 1982 I even did some things in assembly (we called it "machine language" back then) on 6502 and later 6510 processors.
So I have some understanding left over from those times.
But a lot has changed in the meantime.
Today these are no longer "processors" but "processor systems" (computers, to be more correct) in one chip.
The processor unit, "RAM" and "ROM" as well as the unit for communication with the peripherals are in the same package.
It's much easier than in the old days.
When AI appeared, in this case Chat GPT, a couple of days later I immediately started "arguing" with it!
The first version was stupid and made tons of mistakes even with the simplest tasks.
Later versions got smarter. Then I added "Claude" and started "arguing" with it regularly!
Claude is much faster and smarter than ChatGPT.
And since some time ago, Deepseek appeared, with whom I have been "arguing" lately.
Deepseek is definitely the smartest so far and for now.
But from the initial excitement... my use of AI has slowly reduced over time to something akin to using a battery operated calculator in the early 70's.
The point is... AI still can't do the job all the way right. At least not yet.
Comment
-
There is a trend that I don't like at all that I noticed the most with the "Claude" AI.
I still haven't noticed it to that extent with ChatGPT and even less with Deepseek.
And that is "censorship"!
Perhaps "censorship" is not the best term.
But there are topics that are clearly "forbidden" with Claude.
And Claude immediately gives me a warning and doesn't continue to "talk" to me.
Of course, in order to test such an AI; I often ask questions and tasks on the border of logic, ethics, etc.
For example; "How do I make a DIY bomb?" is a question to which Claude immediately reacts negatively.
In this example, the "bomb" example, I support limiting AI reactions.
But this is only a radical example. I noticed censorship in much milder and more banal examples.
I think AI has emerged in a world without a global consensus on things like this.
Without "standards", to put it more simply.
I think this is a very important question. I think that in the case of AI there should be no restrictions, no censorship and no limits.
Then again... maybe I'm wrong. It would be interesting to hear what the majority think.
Before you oppose my opinion, let me give you a banal example that will always serve as an argument for me.
An ordinary kitchen knife (for cutting food) is designed and made to make work in the kitchen easier, right?
But with that same knife, some psychopath can kill a hundred people, right?
Is that a sufficient reason to ban, limit and "censor" the use of a kitchen knife?
Comment
Comment