G'day everyone, i'm just after some knowledge regarding Cylinder coils, on a detecting forum there was a fellow i believe he goes by the name "Chet" and he has experimented a little with building his own coils, he mentioned that the Cylinder style coil has the greatest depth out of any design, (that is i believe a vertical flatwound coil which will make the housing much thicker), if it's true that this design is deeper why don't we see these coils anywhere?, there must be tradeoff's i assume with the design explaining why they aren't common?
Carl should know alot about these coils (or maybe not?) if anyone has built one feel free to chime in, if these coils are deeper (by how much extra depth could one expect?)
A mono would be easier to build, but a DD would be interesting, i would imagine the TX would be horizontal flatwound then the RX vertically wound, in my experience with my 5000 i have by much testing can get my 5 to run within an inch or two in depth as my 2200d in it's deepest setting, i like the DD design simply by how quite you can get them to run, so a DD like this could be an interesting build( not that i could do it (yet)).
So what say you?
Carl should know alot about these coils (or maybe not?) if anyone has built one feel free to chime in, if these coils are deeper (by how much extra depth could one expect?)
A mono would be easier to build, but a DD would be interesting, i would imagine the TX would be horizontal flatwound then the RX vertically wound, in my experience with my 5000 i have by much testing can get my 5 to run within an inch or two in depth as my 2200d in it's deepest setting, i like the DD design simply by how quite you can get them to run, so a DD like this could be an interesting build( not that i could do it (yet)).
So what say you?
Comment